...
首页> 外文期刊>Solar Energy >Recalibration of SPN1 pyranometers against pyrheliometer and its relevance for the evaluation of concentrating solar process heat plants
【24h】

Recalibration of SPN1 pyranometers against pyrheliometer and its relevance for the evaluation of concentrating solar process heat plants

机译:SPN1日射强度计相对于日射强度计的重新校准及其与聚光太阳能热电厂评估的相关性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Accurate determination of direct normal irradiance (DNI) is essential for evaluating and monitoring of concentrating solar power (CSP) and solar process heat (SPH) plants. Currently, a bi-axially tracked Pyrheliometer (PHM) is the most accurate measuring device, but requires high maintenance effort and is cost-intensive. As an alternative, the cost-effective pyranometer SPN1 was investigated by comparing highly resolved minute mean DNI measurements of two SPN1 devices to a reference PHM at the Institute for Solar Technology SPF in Rapperswil (Switzerland). To reduce systematic errors, a linear and a quadratic correction function have been applied to four years of measurements. They reduced the root mean square error RMSE from 48.8 W/m(2) (11.5% of mean PHM DNI = 426 W/m(2)) to 37.9 W/m(2) (8.9%) and 29.6 W/m(2) (6.9%), respectively. It is also shown that even recalibrations based on only one month of data already reduced the RMSE to maximum 33.4 W/m(2) (7.8%), if conducted between April and September. Considering the impact of solar elevation and DNI range on the SPN1 accuracy by bifurcating the correction functions only resulted in a negligibly small improvement of the RMSE. Finally, the influence of SPN1's DNI measurement accuracy on the performance analysis of a real SPH plant in Switzerland was evaluated. After recalibration and correction of DNI values, the evaluation of monitoring data yielded annual efficiencies that were 15% and 12% higher in 2014 and 2015, respectively. It is recommended to recalibrate SPN1 devices over a minimum of one month against a PHM according to the methods presented in this paper.
机译:准确确定直接法向辐照度(DNI)对于评估和监视聚光太阳能(CSP)和太阳能过程热(SPH)工厂至关重要。当前,双轴跟踪高温计(PHM)是最精确的测量设备,但是需要大量的维护工作并且成本很高。作为替代方案,通过比较两个SPN1设备的高度分辨的分钟平均DNI测量值与位于瑞士拉珀斯维尔的太阳能技术研究所SPF的参考PHM进行比较,研究了具有成本效益的日射强度计SPN1。为减少系统误差,线性和二次校正函数已应用于四年的测量。他们将均方根误差从48.8 W / m(2)(平均PHM DNI的11.5%= 426 W / m(2))降至37.9 W / m(2)(8.9%)和29.6 W / m( 2)(6.9%)。还表明,即使仅基于一个月的数据进行重新校准,如果在4月至9月之间进行,RMSE也会降至最大33.4 W / m(2)(7.8%)。通过分叉校正函数来考虑太阳高度和DNI范围对SPN1精度的影响,只会导致RMSE的改善微不足道。最后,评估了SPN1的DNI测量精度对瑞士一家真正的SPH工厂的性能分析的影响。在对DNI值进行重新校准和校正之后,对监测数据的评估得出的2014年和2015年的年效率分别提高了15%和12%。建议根据本文介绍的方法在至少一个月内针对PHM重新校准SPN1设备。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Solar Energy》 |2020年第2期|344-358|共15页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位

    HSR Univ Appl Sci SPF Inst Solar Technol Oberseestr 10 CH-8640 Rapperswil Switzerland|ZAE Bayern Bavarian Ctr Appl Energy Res Walther Meissner Str 6 D-85748 Garching Germany;

    ZAE Bayern Bavarian Ctr Appl Energy Res Walther Meissner Str 6 D-85748 Garching Germany;

    HSR Univ Appl Sci SPF Inst Solar Technol Oberseestr 10 CH-8640 Rapperswil Switzerland;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    DNI; SPN1 pyranometer; Recalibration; Uncertainty; Concentrating collector; Solar process heat;

    机译:DNI;SPN1总辐射表;重新校准;不确定;浓缩收集器;太阳能过程热;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号