...
首页> 外文期刊>Social Semiotics >The aesthetic public sphere and the transformation of criticism
【24h】

The aesthetic public sphere and the transformation of criticism

机译:审美公共领域与批评的转变

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article argues that criticism is fundamental for understanding how culture and politics shape the ambiguous self-interpretation of society. An initial exploration of Habermas's theory of the public sphere reveals that it is inadequately cultural. An alternative is thus offered by discussing the work of Jacobs, and especially his concept of an “aesthetic public sphere”. His insight that nothing is too trivial when it comes to broadening the limits of the public sphere prompts scholars to take into consideration the positive as well as negative aspects of criticism. As a cultural mediation, criticism is shaped by a struggle for recognition that gives rise to the interpretation of its own crisis. The purpose of the article, however, is to propose a more balance account of such predicament. By discussing online criticism, the rise of the “prosumer” and user-generated content, it is argued that there is now a new battle for authority and legitimacy undergoing. This creates the potential for the democratization of criticism, even though this potential has great chance to remain within an inescapable democratic tension.View full textDownload full textKeywordspolitical culture, aesthetic public sphere, institution of criticism, crisis of criticism, Internet, user-generated content, film and television criticismRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2011.564393
机译:本文认为,批评是理解文化和政治如何塑造社会模棱两可的自我解释的基础。哈贝马斯的公共领域理论的初步探索表明,它是不适当的文化。因此,通过讨论雅各布的作品,特别是他的“审美公共领域”的概念,提供了一种替代方法。他关于扩大公共领域的范围并没有什么太琐碎的见解,促使学者们考虑批评的积极和消极方面。作为一种文化调解,批评是通过争取承认的斗争而形成的,这引起了对自身危机的解释。但是,本文的目的是为这种困境提供一个更平衡的解释。通过讨论在线批评,“生产者”的兴起以及用户生成的内容,人们认为现在正在发生一场有关权威和合法性的新战。这为批评民主化创造了潜力,尽管这种潜力有很大的机会保持在不可避免的民主张力中。查看全文下载全文关键字政治文化,审美公共领域,批评机构,批评危机,互联网,用户生成的内容,影视批评有关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b “};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2011.564393

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号