...
首页> 外文期刊>Social Dynamics >Social justice, care and developmental welfare in South Africa: a capabilities perspective
【24h】

Social justice, care and developmental welfare in South Africa: a capabilities perspective

机译:南非的社会正义,照料与发展福利:能力观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One of the paradoxes of the democratic project in South Africa is that the combination of political empowerment, organised constituencies of poor people and increasing social sector spending has made minimal impact on increasing equality. Despite an overall macroeconomic framework that emphasises fiscal restraint, social welfare spending has increased in the past 14 years, and dramatically so since 2003. Almost one in four South Africans receives some or other form of grant, and the majority of recipients are women. Indeed, South Africa is regularly described as the developing world's largest and most generous welfare state. I address the extent to which gender inequalities are reduced through public sector spending, asking the question: what is the optimal relationship between social policy and the intrinsic democratic goals of equality, social justice and citizenship? Drawing on Amartya Sen's capabilities approach, the article argues that a focus on social sector spending alone is inadequate to address questions of social justice. Instead, I draw attention to the normative assumptions, discursive environment and institutional context in which social policy is elaborated and implemented. I argue that, in a context in which there is relatively poor infrastructural capacity in the state to ensure that service delivery takes place in fair, consistent and egalitarian ways, households and communities act as shock absorbers of state failures and women's gendered burdens increase, despite formal commitments to gender equality. While women appear to have gained from political empowerment, women politicians did not effectively leverage their position in the state to promote pro-poor policies or to build coalitions to challenge the watering down of early commitments to reducing gender inequalities.
机译:南非民主计划的一个悖论是,政治授权,穷人的有组织选民和社会部门支出的增加,对增进平等的影响很小。尽管总体宏观经济框架强调财政限制,但在过去14年中,社会福利支出有所增加,自2003年以来显着增加。南非几乎有四分之一的人获得某种或其他形式的赠款,大多数接受者是妇女。确实,南非经常被描述为发展中国家最大,最慷慨的福利国家。我谈到通过公共部门支出在多大程度上减少了性别不平等,并提出了一个问题:社会政策与内在的平等,社会正义和公民民主目标之间的最佳关系是什么?文章借鉴了阿玛蒂亚·森(Amartya Sen)的能力方法,认为仅关注社会部门支出不足以解决社会正义问题。相反,我提请人们注意制定和执行社会政策的规范性假设,话语环境和制度背景。我认为,在该州确保基础设施以公平,一致和平等的方式提供服务的基础设施能力相对较差的情况下,家庭和社区充当了国家失败的缓冲带,尽管妇女承担了两性负担对性别平等的正式承诺。尽管妇女似乎已从赋予政治权力中受益,但女政治家并未有效利用其在国家中的地位来促进扶贫政策或建立联盟,以挑战淡化减少性别不平等的早期承诺。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号