...
首页> 外文期刊>Social Dynamics >South African NGOs and the public sphere: between popular movements and partnerships for development
【24h】

South African NGOs and the public sphere: between popular movements and partnerships for development

机译:南非非政府组织和公共领域:在民众运动与发展伙伴关系之间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines the widespread notion that post-apartheid democracy can be deepened and civil society strengthened by NGO activities in the sphere of public debate and participation. I focus on a number of interrelated processes which I argue may compromise NGOs' ability to expand the public sphere: first, donors' overwhelming focus on NGOs as the sole representative of civil society may contribute to a homogenous and institutionalised public sphere; second, the tendency for NGOs to be drawn into partnerships with government bodies and corporate sponsors casts doubt on their ability to open up spaces for critical public debate. By directing attention to popular movements as potentially offering a site for the production of critique, NGOs' relationships to such movements are examined. It is argued that attention must be paid to the processes of NGO-isation and reformism by which NGOs themselves come to define what civil society should be and may consequently contain counterpublic spheres.
机译:本文探讨了广泛的观念,即通过非政府组织在公共辩论和参与领域的活动,可以扩大种族隔离后的民主并加强民间社会。我关注一些相互关联的过程,这些过程可能会损害非政府组织扩大公共领域的能力:首先,捐助者对民间组织的唯一代表非政府组织的压倒性关注可能会促进同质化和制度化的公共领域。第二,非政府组织倾向于与政府机构和企业赞助者建立伙伴关系,这使人们对它们为进行公开辩论提供空间的能力产生了怀疑。通过将注意力集中在流行运动上,因为它有可能提供批评的场所,因此可以检查非政府组织与这些运动的关系。有人认为,必须注意非政府组织化和改良主义的过程,非政府组织本身通过这些过程来界定什么是公民社会,并因此可能包含反公共领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号