...
首页> 外文期刊>Social Dynamics >Democracy and dictatorship
【24h】

Democracy and dictatorship

机译:民主与专政

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article discusses recent developments in South African politics from the perspective of a paradox, even a contradiction, inherent in the democratic project itself. Democracy requires that the people, the source of democratic authority, are considered purely as an ideal. This is precisely what is at work in the notion of 'human rights', for example. The specific qualities and character of individuals - their culture, norms, values and history - are stripped away to venerate them simply in their essential humanness, that is as a pure abstraction. The moment, however, democracy is located in a specific state, the people are transformed from abstract and essential humanity into a concrete one, unified on the basis of some or other shared characteristic or norm (commitment to freedom, investment in a particular culture and notion of the good and so on). Yet, if 'people' is really a normative term, rather than a descriptive one, then 'democracy's people' refers only to those persons who fit this norm. What this authorises is the privileging of certain classes of people, in democracy's name, within the political system. I will argue that authoritarian tendencies in South Africa's political culture are effects of the contradiction above. I will consider this tendency to dictatorship, not simply in 'totalitarian' constitutions or political dispensations, but in the heart of the most classically democratic ones as well. In this regard, I will review the American Constitution to discuss some of its 'undemocratic' features. In the last part of this article, I will consider the effects on South Africa's democracy of trying to incarnate the people of South Africa as an 'African' people. What is at stake here is the concretisation of the people of democracy as a particular people. We will see that this has unleashed an identitarian politics about the content of this African identity. More importantly, it has authorised those who claim to be authentic Africans to assume privileged positions in politics and in the state.
机译:本文从民主项目本身固有的悖论甚至矛盾的角度讨论了南非政治的最新发展。民主要求人民,民主权威的源头,纯粹是一种理想。例如,这正是“人权”概念正在发挥作用。剥夺了个人的特定品质和特征-他们的文化,规范,价值观和历史-只是以他们的基本人性来崇敬他们,这是纯粹的抽象。但是,在民主处于特定状态的那一刻,人民就从抽象的基本人类转变为具体的人类,在某些或其他共同特征或规范(致力于自由,对特定文化的投资和善意等)。但是,如果“人民”确实是一个规范性术语,而不是描述性术语,则“民主人民”仅指那些符合该规范的人。这授权的是在政治体系内以民主的名义赋予某些阶层的人特权。我将争辩说,南非政治文化中的威权主义倾向是上述矛盾的结果。我将不仅在“极权主义”宪法或政治体制中,而且在最古典的民主体制的核心中,都考虑这种独裁统治的趋势。在这方面,我将回顾《美国宪法》,以讨论其“非民主”特征。在本文的最后一部分,我将考虑试图将南非人民化为“非洲”人民对南非民主的影响。这里所要解决的是民主人民具体化的具体化。我们将看到,这引发了关于这种非洲身份的内容的认同政治。更重要的是,它授权那些自称真正的非洲人的人在政治和国家中享有特权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号