...
首页> 外文期刊>Social Dynamics >Public spheres, hidden politics and struggles over space: boundaries of public engagement in post-apartheid South Africa
【24h】

Public spheres, hidden politics and struggles over space: boundaries of public engagement in post-apartheid South Africa

机译:公共领域,隐藏的政治和太空斗争:种族隔离后的南非公众参与的边界

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The development of a public sphere forms a central ingredient in the consolidation of a new political culture following a transition to democracy. The Habermasian idea of the public sphere has been challenged for not taking into account the role of 'part' and 'counter public spheres', particularly with reference to 'developing' societies. 'Actually existing' public spheres must therefore be conceptualised within the framework of a broader category of 'public space'. A national public sphere in South Africa is held back by inequalities of wealth and power. A minority public of privileged consumers has access to a structure of print and electronic media, while the majority population relies on different systems of networking that make up counter publics. After 1994, the public sphere has been influenced by a dominant-party system, accompanied by a division into formal and informal politics, with formal politics assuming a ritualistic function and 'Realpolitik' being played out within the non-public structures of the dominant party. Meanwhile, critical public debate has had to find its course through varieties of informal politics. The article examines how moral debates around HIV/AIDS and crime in KwaZulu-Natal have constituted an alternative arena for debate, and how cultural and religious discourses have been the channels of a local public sphere. The article discusses to what extent debates have constituted a local democratic 'deliberative public sphere', and looks at the ways in which the local state in the form of the eThekwini Municipality has interacted with local publics since 1994.
机译:公共领域的发展是向民主过渡后巩固新的政治文化的重要组成部分。哈贝马斯关于公共领域的思想受到挑战,因为它没有考虑到“部分”和“反公共领域”的作用,特别是在提到“发展中”社会时。因此,“实际存在的”公共领域必须在更广泛的“公共空间”范畴内进行概念化。南非的国家公共领域受到财富和权力不平等的阻碍。少数享有特权的消费者可以使用印刷媒体和电子媒体的结构,而大多数人则依赖组成柜台公众的不同联网系统。 1994年以后,公共领域受到统治党制的影响,伴随着形式政治和非正式政治的划分,形式政治承担了仪式性的功能,“ Realpolitik”在统治党的非公共结构中发挥作用。同时,批判性公共辩论必须通过各种非正式政治找到自己的方向。本文探讨了关于夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省关于艾滋病毒/艾滋病和犯罪的道德辩论如何构成了可供选择的辩论场所,以及文化和宗教话语如何成为当地公共领域的渠道。本文讨论了辩论在多大程度上构成了地方民主的“协商公共领域”,并探讨了自1994年以来以eThekwini市形式存在的地方政府与地方公众的互动方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号