...
首页> 外文期刊>Social Dynamics: A journal of African studies >‘Africanisation’, African identities and emancipation in contemporary South Africa
【24h】

‘Africanisation’, African identities and emancipation in contemporary South Africa

机译:“非洲化”,当代南非的非洲身份和解放

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article problematises the concept of ‘Africanisation’ as a response to colonial conquest and apartheid rule, bearing both political and knowledge consequences. It aims to rescue ‘Africanisation’ from essentialist notions, but at the same time to show how paradigms cannot be simply applied where they derive from quite different experiences. The article introduces modes of differentiating concepts that are dynamic, as opposed to static, singular and unmediated meanings that bedevil any emancipatory project. The tendency to see a moment in the life of a concept as having a settled and finalised meaning renders the qualities of democracy, and other similar liberating concepts, as settled though their meaning is never finally realised. While colonialism marginalised and devalued local knowledges, the national liberation project sought unity/homogenisation, which tended to deny distinct identities, as is largely the case today. There remains hostility to pluralism at a social and political level and a failure to recognise autonomous identities unconnected to the state or the ruling organisation, the African National Congress (ANC). The tendency towards static notions of custom and paradigms that do not derive from the experiences of African women, in particular, has tended to erase the voices of women or prejudice the emancipation of women from patriarchal oppression. Africanisation, the article proposes, must be located through an ongoing dialogue between dynamic local knowledges and a range of other explanatory tools.View full textDownload full textKeywordsapartheid, African, concepts, paradigms, emancipation, identities, knowledgesRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02533952.2010.517624
机译:本文对“非洲化”的概念提出了质疑,它是对殖民地征服和种族隔离统治的回应,并带有政治和知识上的后果。它旨在从本质主义概念中拯救“非洲化”,但同时也展示了范式不能简单地应用于源自完全不同的经验的地方。本文介绍了动态区分概念的模式,而不是静态,奇异和无中介的含义,这些含义妨碍了任何解放性的项目。倾向于将某个概念的一刻看成具有确定的和最终确定的含义,这赋予了民主和其他类似的解放概念的质量,尽管这些概念从未最终实现,但它们已经解决了。殖民主义使当地知识边缘化和贬低,而国家解放计划则寻求统一/同质化,这往往否认了独特的身份,今天的情况就是如此。在社会和政治层面上,对多元主义仍然怀有敌意,也没有认识到与国家或统治组织(非洲人国民大会)无关的自治身份。并非来自非洲妇女经验的习惯和范式的静态观念趋向于趋向于抹去妇女的声音或损害妇女脱离父权制的压迫。该文章建议,必须通过不断发展的本地知识与一系列其他解释工具之间的持续对话来定位非洲化。查看全文下载全文关键字词素,非洲,概念,范式,解放,身份,知识相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor &Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02533952.2010.517624

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号