It was a dramatic moment in the mostrndramatic confrontation so far between science educators and scientists determined to keep evolution in the classroom and advocates of the quasi-religious theory known as intelligent design (ID). In 2005, Lehigh University biochemist Michael Behe sat on a witness stand in Dover, Pennsylvania, as lawyer Eric Rothschild quizzed him about the claim in Behe's pro-ID book, Darwin's Black Box, that "We can look high or we can look low in books or in journals, but the result is the same. The scientific literature has no answers to the question of the origin of the immune system."
展开▼
机译：到目前为止，科学教育家和决心在课堂上不断发展的科学家以及倡导被称为智能设计（ID）的准宗教理论的科学家之间，在最戏剧性的对抗中，这是一个戏剧性的时刻。 2005年，里海大学（Lehigh University）生物化学家迈克尔·贝（Michael Behe）坐在宾夕法尼亚州多佛（Dover）的证人席上，律师埃里克·罗斯柴尔德（Eric Rothschild）向他询问贝希（Behe）亲ID书《达尔文的黑匣子》（Darwin's Black Box）中的说法：书或期刊，但结果是相同的。科学文献对免疫系统的起源问题没有任何答案。”
展开▼
