首页> 外文期刊>Science in China. Series D, Earth sciences >A contrast of two typical LUCC processes and their driving forces in oases of arid areas: A case study of Sangong River Watershed at the northern foot of Tianshan Mountains
【24h】

A contrast of two typical LUCC processes and their driving forces in oases of arid areas: A case study of Sangong River Watershed at the northern foot of Tianshan Mountains

机译:干旱区绿洲中两种典型LUCC过程及其驱动力对比:以天山北麓三工河流域为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aerial photographs taken in 1978 and 1987, Landsat TM images in 1998 as well as soil, hydrology and socio-economic data for the oases in Sangong River Watershed were processed by Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information System (GIS). There are two typical agricultural land uses in oases, Farm-based Land Use with large-scale intensified agricultural activities (FLU) and Household Responsibility-based Land Use with small-scale activities (HRLU). The Index Model of Land Use/Land Cover Change (LUCC), Weighted Index Sum (WIS) and logistic stepwise regression model were established to contrast the two typical LUCC processes and their driving forces. The land use patterns were dominated by cropland and grassland for the entire region, and cropland, residential and industrial land were increasing stably. In the HRLU areas, woodland and grassland declined dramatically, but in the FLU areas, grassland decreased only by 12.0%, whereas woodland increased by 13.7%. LUCC was stronger in the earlier stage (1978—987) than in the later stage (1987—1998) for the entire region. LUCC was more intense in the HRLU areas than in the FLU areas during the entire period (1978—1998). Policy was a key factor in the land use change, and water resources were a precondition in land use. Under the control of policy and water resources, the main human driving factors included population and economy, and the main natural restrictions were soil fertility and groundwater depth. Human driving factors controlled the land change in the HRLU areas, but natural restriction factors dominated in the FLU areas. In the mean time, intensification of LUCC in the region had some spatiotemporal implications with a fluctuation of impact factors.
机译:遥感(RS)和地理信息系统(GIS)处理了1978年和1987年的航空照片,1998年的Landsat TM图像以及三宫河流域的绿洲的土壤,水文和社会经济数据。绿洲中有两种典型的农业土地用途,即具有大规模集约化农业活动的农场土地利用(FLU)和具有小规模活动的基于家庭责任的土地利用(HRLU)。建立了土地利用/土地覆盖变化指数模型(LUCC),加权指数总和(WIS)和逻辑逐步回归模型,以对比两种典型的LUCC过程及其驱动力。整个地区的土地利用方式以耕地和草地为主,耕地,居民用地和工业用地稳定增长。在HRLU地区,林地和草原急剧减少,但在FLU地区,草原仅减少12.0%,而林地增加13.7%。在整个地区,LUCC在早期(1978-987年)比后期(1987-1998年)要强。在整个时期(1978年至1998年),HRLU地区的LUCC强度要高于FLU地区的LUCC强度。政策是土地利用变化的关键因素,而水资源是土地利用的前提。在政策和水资源的控制下,人类的主要驱动因素包括人口和经济,主要的自然限制是土壤肥力和地下水深度。人类驱动因素控制着HRLU地区的土地变化,但自然限制因素在FLU地区占主导地位。同时,该地区土地利用变化和土地集约化的加剧具有时空影响,影响因子也有所波动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号