...
首页> 外文期刊>Science as Culture >Historicizing Sustainability: German Scientific Forestry in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries
【24h】

Historicizing Sustainability: German Scientific Forestry in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries

机译:实现可持续性的历史化:18世纪和19世纪的德国科学林业

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

German scientific forestry is generally referred to as a starting point for the concept of sustainability and the variety of interpretations it has found in recent public and scientific discourses. Its early history in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, however, is treated, more or less, as a founding narrative' with all the typical aspects of this literary device: simplicity, a degree of mysticism and a teleological relation to the current state of the art. But there is more insight to be gained from the history of scientific forestry, and sustainability in particular, than the affirmative creation of tradition. The origins of sustainability were fraught with conflict. Focusing on timber production and financial revenue for the state treasury, scientific forestry simplified the biological composition of forests, re-organized their internal structure along the lines of legibility and accountability, and restricted access for users other than scientifically trained personnel. The modernization and streamlining of Central European forests provoked resistance and violent clashes. After about four decades, foresters also noted environmental changes in the forests such as increased vulnerability to drought, storms and forest pests. The history of forest management planning, introduced in the 1820s, and of experimental forestry in the 1860s, exemplifies how techno-scientific systems communicate with socio-cultural and natural environments. However strongly a science-based reform programme tries to disentangle itself from the politics of nature, such programmes, as well as the terminology by which they are fed into and received by public discourse, are subject to historical change and power struggles.
机译:德国科学林业通常被称为可持续性概念的起点,以及在最近的公共和科学论述中发现的各种解释。然而,它在18世纪和19世纪的早期历史或多或少都被视为该文学装置所有典型方面的奠基性叙述:简单性,一定程度的神秘主义以及与当前状态的目的论联系。艺术。但是,从科学林业的历史,尤其是可持续性方面,比肯定的传统创造有更多的见识。可持续发展的起源充满了冲突。科学林业着眼于国库的木材生产和财政收入,简化了森林的生物组成,按照易读性和责任制重新组织了其内部结构,并限制了除受过科学训练的人员外的用户的使用。中欧森林的现代化和精简引发了抵抗和暴力冲突。大约四十年后,林业工作者还注意到森林中的环境变化,例如对干旱,暴风雨和森林害虫的脆弱性增加。在1820年代引入的森林管理规划和1860年代的实验性林业的历史说明了技术科学系统如何与社会文化和自然环境进行交流。然而,以科学为基础的改革计划强烈地试图使其与自然政治脱钩,此类计划以及其被公众话语所接受和接受的术语受到历史变革和权力斗争的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号