首页> 外文期刊>Road Traffic Reports >R. ⅴ THOMAS (DEAN)
【24h】

R. ⅴ THOMAS (DEAN)

机译:R.ⅴ托马斯(Dean)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Defendant colliding with cyclist on roundabout while over prescribed drug limit- Whether driving/ailing below standard expected of competent and careful driver- Whether defendant requiring intermediary throughout trial because of weak cognitive functioning exacerbated by medication and depression-Correct approach to appointment of intermediary-Road Traffic Act 1988 s.3A(1)(ba)-Criminal Practice Directions 2015, paras 3F.12, 3F.13. Section 3A(l)(ba) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 [as inserted by s.3 of the Road Traffic Act 1991 and para.2(2) of Sch.22 to the Crime and Courts Act 2013] provides: "If a person causes the death of another person by driving a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the road or place, and-... (ba) he has in his body a specified controlled drug and the proportion of it in his blood or urine at that time exceeds the specified limit for that drug ... he is guilty of an offence."
机译:被告与骑自行车的人在环形交叉路口上碰撞,而在规定的药物限制上 - 是否在胜利和仔细的司机的标准期望的驾驶/生病的驾驶/疾病 - 是否因为弱的认知功能而要求中间人的被告人被治疗和抑郁症的预约的弱势效果加剧了中介交通法案1988 S.3a(1)(BA) - 犯罪实践指示2015,第3F.12,3F.13。第3A(L)(L)(BA)1988年道路交通法案[由S.2(1991年的S.2)和Sch.22的Sch.22至2013年法庭法案的第2(2)条)提供:“如果一个人通过在道路或其他公共场所驾驶机械推进的车辆而没有适当关注和关注,或者没有合理地考虑使用道路或地方的其他人,而且他有在他的身体中,在他的血液或尿液中,当时的血液或尿液的比例超过了该药物的规定限额......他犯了罪行。“

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号