...
首页> 外文期刊>RIBA Journal >Quick And Dirty
【24h】

Quick And Dirty

机译:又快又脏

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Architects, like all others in construction, are having a tougher time than usual in ensuring they are paid on their projects. With new work increasingly scarce, they are understandably cautious about kicking up a fuss with existing clients over late or non-existent payment. However, where matters have gone beyond a joke and the relationship between the architect and the client has failed irredeemably, what is the architect to do? Many options have been discussed in previous articles, but adjudication does remain a possible course of action. Unfortunately, the most likely reason for not getting paid in today's economic climate is that the client is in financial difficulties. The daunting prospect of launching any sort of claim, including adjudication, against the client for outstanding payments will be only be exacerbated if large legal bills are racked up, only for the client to become properly insolvent. The advantage of adjudication over other forms of claim is that it is'quick and dirty' (well, reasonably), which minimises the fees.
机译:像其他所有在建建筑师一样,建筑师在确保他们的项目获得报酬方面比以往更加艰难。随着新工作的日益稀缺,可以理解的是,他们谨慎对待与现有客户的逾期付款或不存在付款问题。但是,如果事情已经超出了玩笑的范围,并且架构师与客户之间的关系不可避免地失败了,那么架构师该怎么办?先前的文章中已经讨论了许多选择,但是裁决确实仍然是可行的做法。不幸的是,在当今的经济环境下无法获得报酬的最可能原因是客户陷入财务困境。仅当大量法律票据被搁置时,才对客户提出任何类型的索赔(包括裁决)的艰巨前景会加剧,只会使客户适当地破产。与其他形式的主张相比,裁决的优势在于它“快捷又脏”(合理,合理),可将费用降到最低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号