...
首页> 外文期刊>RIBA journal >DOUBLETAKE: WHEN IS A DOOR NOT A DOOR?
【24h】

DOUBLETAKE: WHEN IS A DOOR NOT A DOOR?

机译:杜比塔克:什么时候门不是门?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

When it's ajar, of course - thankfully, not an issue with the old revolving door. And I stress the word 'old' - they've been around since H Bockhacker of Berlin took out a patent on one in 1881. And it may come as a statement of the patently bleedin' obvious to be informed that the direction in which they revolve is dictated by whether you drive on the right or the left. So that'll be left in the UK, India and Japan, but right in the US, Europe, Turkey and Africa. But not if it's Foster's GLA Building (far left), where the double revolving entrance doors run counter to one another - perhaps a small nod to London's status as one of the most multicultural cities in the world? So what more can revolving doors possibly do for advancing the cause of humanity? Their draught excluding qualities have been acknowledged since Bockhacker's patent (his 'Tuer ohne Luftzug' meant 'door without draught'), but it turns out that Dutch manufacturer Boon Edam is producing dynamo doors that generate electricity with every user (left).
机译:当然,半开时-幸好,旧的旋转门不是问题。我强调“老”一词-自从柏林H. Bockhacker于1881年获得一项专利以来,它们就存在了。这很可能是对专利流失的一种表述。旋转取决于您是向右行驶还是向左行驶。因此,它将留在英国,印度和日本,但是留在美国,欧洲,土耳其和非洲。但是,如果不是福斯特(Foster)的GLA大楼(最左端),双旋转入口彼此相对的话-也许是对伦敦作为世界上最多元文化的城市之一的地位的一点点赞扬?那么,旋转门还能为促进人类事业做什么呢?自从Bockhacker的专利(他的“ Tuer ohne Luftzug”的意思是“没有通风口的门”)以来,他们的除质量草案就得到了认可,但是事实证明,荷兰制造商Boon Edam生产的发电机门可以为每个用户供电(左图)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《RIBA journal》 |2010年第2期|51|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号