...
首页> 外文期刊>Restoration ecology >Floral resource selection by wild bees and honey bees in the Midwest United States: implications for designing pollinator habitat
【24h】

Floral resource selection by wild bees and honey bees in the Midwest United States: implications for designing pollinator habitat

机译:美国中西部地区野蜜蜂和蜂蜜蜜蜂的花卉资源选择:为设计粉碎机栖息地的含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many seed mix recommendations for creating pollinator habitat are in part based on anecdotal evidence or field observations of bees visiting forbs (i.e. use). However, there is limited information on what forbs are preferred by bees, particularly in working landscapes where bee forage may be limited. We examined floral resource selection by wild bees and honey bees on grasslands in the Midwest using a 5-year dataset containing over 8,000 plant-bee interactions. We observed wild bees visiting 83 forb species, but only 14 species were significantly selected (i.e. bees visited a plant more than expected based on availability). Approximately 70% of all wild bee visitations were on native flowers, whereas only 20% of all honey bee visitations were on natives. Honey bees visited 70 forb species, but only four forbs were significantly selected. The selection ratio for each forb species was not correlated with proportion of use by wild bees or honey bees, suggesting that bee visitation data alone do not elucidate patterns of forb selection or avoidance. We then compared our resource selection results to forbs recommended by U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) for regional pollinator habitat plantings. Many forbs that were selected by bees in our study were also recommended by USDA; however, some USDA-recommended forbs were selected against by bees. A greater understanding of which floral resources are selected by bees can assist land managers in assessing conservation seed mixes and ultimately provide diverse, season-long pollinator forage in working landscapes.
机译:许多用于创造粉碎机栖息地的种子混合建议部分基于蜜蜂访问FORB(即使用)的蚁群证据或现场观察。然而,有关蜜蜂优选的福尔斯的信息有限,特别是在蜜蜂饲料的工作景观中可能受到限制。我们在中西部地区的草原上检查了野生蜜蜂和蜂蜜蜜蜂的花卉资源选择,使用了超过8,000种植物蜜蜂相互作用的5年的数据集。我们观察到野生蜜蜂访问83种Forb物种,但只有14种被显着选择(即蜜蜂访问的植物超过预期的基于可用性)。大约70%的野兔偏见都在原生花上,而只有20%的蜂蜜蜜蜂审视都在当地人。蜜蜂访问了70个Forb物种,但只有四个陷阱被显着选择。每个FORB物种的选择率与野生蜜蜂或蜂蜜蜜蜂的使用量不相关,表明单独的蜜蜂探访数据不阐明FORB选择或避免的模式。然后,我们将资源选择结果与美国农业部(USDA)建议的FORBS进行比较,为区域抚摸者栖息地种植。我们的研究中也建议在我们的研究中选择的许多福尔斯州;但是,一些USDA推荐的FORB被蜜蜂选择了蜜蜂。更加了解蜜蜂选择花卉资源可以协助土地管理人员评估保护种子混合物,最终提供多样化的季节长的粉碎机牧草。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号