...
首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >Describing krotovinas: A contribution to methodology and interpretation
【24h】

Describing krotovinas: A contribution to methodology and interpretation

机译:描述克罗托维纳斯:对方法论和解释的贡献

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Filled mammal tunnels (krotovinas) are the most common traces in modern grassland soils and trace fossils in loess paleosols. Krotovinas are still insufficiently used in paleogeographic reconstructions owing to the absence of a procedure for documenting their features. When their tracemaker can be identified, krotovinas complement body fossil evidence for past geographic ranges of fossorial mammals. Moreover, local palaeoenvironments can be reconstructed more precisely based on the preferred habitat of the identified species. However, the morphology of krotovinas has rarely been reported in detail that would allow their identification.In this article, we suggest five groups of diagnostic features that should be recorded and assessed for taxonomic identification of krotovinas. (1) Ornamentation on the burrow walls, which can be observed when there is sediment compaction contrast between infill and the host material, provides the most taxonomically specific features. (2) Infill type distinguishes between subterranean forms and other burrowers. (3) Tunnel repair and reburrowing patterns. (4) Motifs representing distinctive architectural elements: shafts, spirals, their connections to horizontal tunnels, the shape of chambers, and the predominant orientation of tunnels (horizontal, inclined, vertical). (5) Diameter, which has to be measured transverse to each tunnel or estimated from oblique sections. The measurements and observations can be compared against a reference collection of burrow plaster casts. Synoptic diagrams are suggested as a method for condensing images of diagnostic features from several sections. We suggest that the presence of krotovinas is one criterion for distinguishing grassland paleosols from humus-rich colluvial deposits.
机译:充满哺乳动物的隧道(krotovinas)是现代草原土壤中最常见的痕迹,而在黄土古土壤中则是化石的痕迹。由于缺乏用于记录其特征的程序,因此Krotovinas在古地理重建中仍未得到足够的使用。当可以确定其示踪剂时,克罗托维纳斯补充了过去化石哺乳动物地理范围的人体化石证据。此外,可以根据已识别物种的首选栖息地,更精确地重建当地的古环境。然而,鲜有关于克罗托维纳斯形态的报道,很少能对其进行鉴定。在本文中,我们建议应记录和评估五类诊断特征,以便对克罗托维纳斯进行分类鉴定。 (1)在填充物和主体材料之间存在泥沙压实对比时,可以观察到洞穴壁上的装饰物,该装饰物提供了最分类上特定的特征。 (2)填充类型区分地下形式和其他挖洞者。 (3)隧道的修复和再挖模式。 (4)代表独特建筑元素的主题:竖井,螺旋,它们与水平隧道的连接,舱室的形状以及隧道的主要方向(水平,倾斜,垂直)。 (5)直径,该直径必须横向于每个隧道进行测量,或者根据倾斜截面进行估算。可以将测量结果和观察结果与洞穴石膏模型的参考集合进行比较。建议使用概要图作为一种方法,用于汇总来自多个部分的诊断特征的图像。我们建议,krotovinas的存在是区分富含腐殖质的河床沉积物的草地古土壤的标准之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号