...
首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >Hydrological modeling of River Xiangxi using SWAT2005: A comparison of model parameterizations using station and gridded meteorological observations
【24h】

Hydrological modeling of River Xiangxi using SWAT2005: A comparison of model parameterizations using station and gridded meteorological observations

机译:利用SWAT2005对湘西河进行水文模拟:利用站观测和网格化气象观测进行模型参数化的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Gridded climate data sets are widely used in the analysis, modeling and forecasting of the consequences of climate change. The objective of this study is to compare the impact of different climate datasets (station vs. gridded) on the parameterization of a hydrological model (developed using SWAT2005) of the River Xiangxi, the largest tributary of Yangtze River in the Hubei part of the Three Gorges Reservoir. Climate data used in this study derive from two sources: point daily observations from the Xingshan meteorological station (STN) and gridded (0.5° × 0.5°) monthly observations of the CRU TS3.0 global dataset (CRU) downscaled to daily data using a weather generator. Data from 1970 to 1974 were applied for sensitivity analyses and autocalibration and subsequently validate hindcasts over the period 1976-1986. Despite there being only slight differences in mean annual precipitation (1003 mm vs. 1052 mm) between STN and CRU, the data differ more in their estimates of the number of rain days (136 vs. 112) and wet days standard deviation (11.75 mm vs. 18.49 mm). The mean, maximum and minimum temperatures from CRU are all lower than those from STN. SWAT parameter sensitivity analysis results show slight differences in the relative rank of the most sensitive parameters, with the differences mainly caused by the lower temperature and more intensive rainfall in CRU relative to STN. Autocalibrated parameters showed very similar values, except for the surface runoff lag coefficient which is higher for the CRU dataset compared to that derived from the STN dataset. Statistic results for discharge simulated based on CRU compared rather well with that based on STN CRU as evaluated using the standard statistics of the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency, coefficient of determination, and percent error. The sensitivity analysis and autocalibration tool embedded in SWAT2005 is a powerful utility in hydrological modeling of the River Xiangxi, and the CRU dataset appears to be appropriate for application to hydrological modeling in this case, thus providing a good basis for climate change studies.
机译:网格化的气候数据集被广泛用于气候变化后果的分析,建模和预测。这项研究的目的是比较不同气候数据集(站点和网格)对湘西河(三个地区的湖北部分最大的长江支流)水文模型(使用SWAT2005开发)的参数化的影响。三峡水库。本研究中使用的气候数据来自两个来源:来自兴山气象站(STN)的点日观测值和使用ARU降级为每日数据的CRU TS3.0全球数据集(CRU)的网格化(0.5°×0.5°)月度观测值。天气生成器。 1970年至1974年的数据用于敏感性分析和自动校准,随后验证了1976-1986年期间的后播。尽管STN和CRU之间的年平均降水量(1003 mm对1052 mm)仅有微小差异,但数据在估计的雨天数(136对112)和湿日标准差(11.75 mm)上差异更大。与18.49毫米)。 CRU的平均,最高和最低温度均低于STN的温度。 SWAT参数敏感性分析结果显示,最敏感参数的相对等级略有差异,差异主要是由CRU相对于STN的较低温度和更密集的降雨引起的。自动校准的参数显示出非常相似的值,除了CRU数据集的地表径流滞后系数比从STN数据集得到的系数更高。使用Nash-Sutcliffe效率,测定系数和百分比误差的标准统计数据评估,基于CRU模拟的排放统计结果与基于STN CRU的统计结果相当好。嵌入在SWAT2005中的灵敏度分析和自动校准工具在湘西河水文建模中具有强大的实用性,在这种情况下CRU数据集似乎适用于水文建模,从而为气候变化研究提供了良好的基础。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Quaternary International》 |2010年第2010期|p.54-59|共6页
  • 作者单位

    National Climate Center, Laboratory for Climate Studies of China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China;

    Department of Geography, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK;

    Department of Geography, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK;

    National Climate Center, Laboratory for Climate Studies of China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China;

    Department of Geography, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK;

    Department of Geography, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号