...
首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >Investigating human and megafauna co-occurrence in Australian prehistory: Mode and causality in fossil accumulations at Cuddie Springs
【24h】

Investigating human and megafauna co-occurrence in Australian prehistory: Mode and causality in fossil accumulations at Cuddie Springs

机译:调查澳大利亚史前人类和大型动物的同时发生:库迪斯普林斯化石堆积的模式和因果关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Human arrival in Sahul - Pleistocene Australia and New Guinea - has long been argued as the catalyst in the decline and disappearance of a suite of extinct animals referred to as megafauna. The debate concerning causality in Sahul is highly polarised, with climate change often cited as the alternative explanatory model. On continental Australia, there are few datasets available with which to explore the likely processes leading to the extinction events. At the present time, there is one site in New Guinea (Nombe Rockshelter) and one on continental Australia (Cuddie Springs) where the coexistence and temporal overlap of humans and megafauna has been identified. The Cuddie Springs Pleistocene archaeological site in southeastern Australia contains an association of fossil extinct and extant fauna with an archaeological record through two sequential stratigraphic units dating from c. 36 to c. 30 ka ago. A taphonomic study of the fossil fauna has revealed an accumulation of bone in a primary depositional context, consistent with a waterhole death assemblage. Overall the faunal assemblage studied here (n: 8146; NISP: 1355) has yielded little direct evidence of carnivore damage or human activities. Post depositional factors such as physical destruction incurred by trampling, compaction of sediments, and/or the hydrological status of the lake at that time have played important roles. As the only known site on continental Australia where megafauna and humans co-occur, the Cuddie Springs faunal assemblage yields equivocal evidence for a significant human role in the accumulation of the fauna here. At the present time there is no evidential basis to the argument that humans had a primary role in the extinction of the Australian megafauna. The first colonisers are likely to have preyed upon those few species known to have persisted to this time, but their impact may have been restricted to the tail end of a process that had been underway for millennia prior to human arrival.
机译:长期以来,人们一直认为人类到达萨乌尔-更新世澳大利亚和新几内亚-是导致被称为巨型动物群的一系列灭绝动物数量减少和消失的催化剂。关于萨胡尔因果关系的争论是两极分化的,气候变化经常被作为替代解释模型。在澳大利亚大陆上,几乎没有可用的数据集来探索导致灭绝事件的可能过程。目前,在新几内亚(Nombe Rockshelter)有一个地点,在澳大利亚大陆(Cuddie Springs)则有一个地点,在这里已经确定了人类与大型动物的共存和时间重叠。澳大利亚东南部的库迪斯普林斯更新世考古遗址包含两个已灭绝的化石和现存动物群,并通过两个连续的地层(始于c)进行了考古记录。 36至c 30年前。对化石动物区系的一项考古学研究表明,在主要的沉积环境中,骨骼积聚,与水坑死亡组合一致。总体而言,这里研究的动物群(n:8146; NISP:1355)几乎没有直接证明食肉动物受到破坏或人类活动的迹象。当时的沉积后因素,例如由于践踏而造成的物理破坏,沉积物的压实和/或当时的湖水状况,都起着重要作用。作为澳大利亚大陆上唯一大型动物和人类并存的地点,库迪斯普林斯的动物群聚集产生了模棱两可的证据,表明人类在这里的动物群积累中起着重要作用。目前,关于人类在澳大利亚大型动物灭绝中起主要作用的论点尚无证据基础。最早的殖民者很可能捕食了迄今一直存在的少数物种,但是它们的影响可能仅限于人类到来之前已经进行了数千年的过程的尾端。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Quaternary International》 |2010年第2010期|123-143|共21页
  • 作者单位

    Australian Key Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, Electron Microscope Unit F09, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia;

    Australian Key Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, Electron Microscope Unit F09, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;

    Department of Archaeology, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号