...
首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >Comparison of uncertainties in projected flood frequency of the Zhujiang River, South China
【24h】

Comparison of uncertainties in projected flood frequency of the Zhujiang River, South China

机译:珠江市预计洪水频率的不确定性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigated uncertainties in the modeling of hydrological impacts of climate change on projected flood frequencies of the Zhujiang River, South China. The hydrological model HBV-D was applied to simulate and project future stream flow based on a multi-model ensemble. As this implies high uncertainties, the magnitude of three uncertainty sources, i.e. emission scenarios, GCM structure, and downscaling techniques, were determined in relation to the observed and projected natural variability. The relative change in each uncertainty source and the overall dominance among the three sources were further analyzed. The changes in flood frequency are projected for five return periods (2, 5, 10, 20, and 50 years) and three future time periods (2020s, 2050s, and 2080s). The results suggest that in comparison to the natural variability of the multi-model ensemble, the uncertainty sources show much stronger variations. The range of their relative change and their dominance vary with the lead-time and return period. In most of the return periods, the dominant uncertainty can primarily be attributed to downscaling techniques and emission scenarios, while GCMs structure is minor in the 2020s. However, downscaling technique is the second dominant source behind GCM structure, while emission scenarios represent the lowest uncertainty ranges of the three sources for the projected flood frequency in the 2050s and 2080s. The uncertainty and projected impact of climate change differs also between the four applied GCMs, as compared to the natural variability MK3_5 shows higher ranges than CCSM3, MK3_5 and ECHAM5. The upper bounds (95% percentile) in uncertainty mostly show an increasing tendency with increasing return period, and partially with increasing lead-time. Hence, the more extreme the return period (higher flood frequency) the higher is the uncertainty of the model projections. It is therefore essential that climate change impact assessments consider a wide range of climate scenarios derived from different GCMs under multiple emission scenarios and including several downscaling techniques. The uncertainty due to natural variability should also be considered more intensely. The projection of flood frequency and the identification and quantification of the uncertainties in the modeling is important for the implementation of adaptation policies into water resource planning in the Zhujiang River basin, South China. This study will enrich the scientific research on the uncertainty from different sources of modeling results in river basin parameters, and help to obtain conclusive results on the importance of different sources of uncertainty.
机译:这项研究调查了气候变化对中国南方珠江的洪水频率预测的水文影响建模中的不确定性。应用水文模型HBV-D来模拟和预测基于多模型集合的未来水流。由于这意味着较高的不确定性,因此确定了三个不确定性源的大小,即排放情景,GCM结构和降尺度技术,这与观测和预测的自然可变性有关。进一步分析了每个不确定性源中的相对变化和三个源中的总体优势。洪水频率的变化预计为五个回归期(2、5、10、20和50年)和三个未来时期(2020s,2050s和2080s)。结果表明,与多模型集合的自然可变性相比,不确定性源显示出更强的变化。它们的相对变化范围和主导地位随交货时间和回收期而变化。在大多数回报期,主要的不确定性主要归因于降尺度技术和排放情景,而GCM的结构在2020年代较小。然而,降尺度技术是仅次于GCM结构的第二主要来源,而排放情景则代表了2050年代和2080年代预计洪水频率的三种来源的最低不确定性范围。与自然变化相比,四个应用的GCM在气候变化的不确定性和预计影响上也有所不同,MK3_5的范围比CCSM3,MK3_5和ECHAM5高。不确定性的上限(95%百分数)大多显示出随着回报期的增加而增加的趋势,而部分地随着交付时间的增加而呈现出增加的趋势。因此,回归期越极端(洪水频率越高),模型预测的不确定性就越大。因此,至关重要的是,气候变化影响评估必须考虑多种排放情景下源自不同GCM的广泛气候情景,其中包括几种降尺度技术。由于自然可变性而引起的不确定性也应被更加强烈地考虑。洪水频率的预测以及模型中不确定性的识别和量化对于在中国南方珠江流域的水资源规划中实施适应政策至关重要。该研究将丰富关于流域参数建模结果不同来源不确定性的科学研究,并有助于获得关于不同不确定性来源重要性的结论性结论。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Quaternary International》 |2013年第5期|51-61|共11页
  • 作者单位

    National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, No. 46 Zhongguancun Nandajie, Haidian, Beijing 100081, China;

    National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, No. 46 Zhongguancun Nandajie, Haidian, Beijing 100081, China,Department of Geosciences, University of Tubingen, Tubingen 72070, Germany;

    National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, No. 46 Zhongguancun Nandajie, Haidian, Beijing 100081, China;

    National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, No. 46 Zhongguancun Nandajie, Haidian, Beijing 100081, China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号