...
首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >The Middle Palaeolithic of Cyrenaica: Is there an Aterian at the Haua Fteah and does it matter?
【24h】

The Middle Palaeolithic of Cyrenaica: Is there an Aterian at the Haua Fteah and does it matter?

机译:Cyrenaica的中古石器时代:Haua Fteah有Aterian,这有关系吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The work of Charles McBurney in the 1950s described the Middle Palaeolithic of Cyrenaica, Libya based upon fieldwork at several localities including the Haua Fteah. The deep stratigraphy of that site has been used as a measure of the Middle Palaeolithic for the area and is being re-examined by the Cyrenaica Prehistory Project. Middle Palaeolithic industries there include the Pre-Aurignacian and Levalloiso -Mousterian and the latter, at least, is associated with modern humans in the form of two mandibles. McBurney and subsequent workers have been ambivalent about the presence of Aterian assemblages at the site and given the association of modern human remains with Levalloiso—Mousterian material is this significant? The nature of industrial succession at the Haua Fteah is discussed following analysis of the McBurney archive and further fieldwork at the site and in its landscape. There is no clear pre-Modern human presence yet demonstrated and so all the Middle Palaeolithic material at the Haua Fteah could be the product of modern humans. If this is so, why do the industries vary and does the reason for this variation explain the absence of the Aterian? The Aterian is present in the surrounding landscape. The Aterian has a clear association with modern humans in the Maghreb and is increasingly seen as an indicator of modern human presence. The sequence at the Haua Fteah can assist in formulating appropriate hypotheses for the processes of modern human dispersals across North Africa and beyond.
机译:查尔斯·麦克伯尼(Charles McBurney)在1950年代的作品根据利比亚的霍亚弗特亚(Hua Fteah)等多个地方的实地考察,描述了利比亚Cyrenaica的中古石器时代。该地点的深层地层已被用作该地区中古石器时代的尺度,并被Cyrenaica史前项目重新审查。那里的中古旧石器时代工业包括前奥里尼亚克人和勒瓦卢索索-穆斯特人,后者至少以两个下颌骨的形式与现代人类联系在一起。 McBurney及其后续工作人员对现场存在Aterian装置产生了歧义,并且考虑到现代人类遗骸与Levalloiso的关联-Mousterian的材料重要吗?在分析McBurney档案以及对该场地及其景观进行进一步野外考察之后,讨论了Haua Fteah工业继承的性质。尚无明显的前现代人类存在证明,因此Haua Fteah上的所有中古旧石器时代材料都可能是现代人类的产物。如果是这样,为什么行业发生变化,这种变化的原因是否可以解释Aterian的缺失? Aterian在周围的风景中。 Aterian与马格里布的现代人类有着明显的联系,并且越来越被视为现代人类存在的标志。 Haua Fteah的顺序可以帮助为现代人类在北非及其他地区的传播过程制定适当的假设。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Quaternary International》 |2013年第25期|171-181|共11页
  • 作者

    Tim Reynolds;

  • 作者单位

    Department of History, Classics and Archaeology, Birkbeck, 26 Russell Square, London WC1B SDQ, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号