...
首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >Another Mousterian Debate? Bordian facies, Chaine operatoire technocomplexes, and patterns of lithic variability in the western European Middle and Upper Pleistocene
【24h】

Another Mousterian Debate? Bordian facies, Chaine operatoire technocomplexes, and patterns of lithic variability in the western European Middle and Upper Pleistocene

机译:另一个穆斯特辩论?西北欧中上更新世的Bordian相,Chaine操纵技术复杂性和岩性变化模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The classic Mousterian Debate of the 1970s has recently been revived, as researchers propose cultural, functional, and chronological interpretations for the Mousterian "technocomplexes". These interpretations, however, are likely to lead to the same impasse that was previously reached forty years ago. The root cause of the problem is analyzing assemblages according to taxonomic units, whether they are Bordian facies or Chaine operatoire technocomplexes, which conflate as well as mask multiple sources of variability. In this paper, we use a database of well-excavated, well-dated sites from the Middle and Upper Pleistocene in western Europe to track changes in key lithic variables through time. We show that the chronological patterning of typological and technological facies yields little information useful for elucidating the causes of Mousterian variability. When individual lithic variables from within assemblages are plotted through time, however, new patterns of variability emerge. Our results show that bifaces are not characteristic only of the "Acheulean" and the "Mousterian of Acheulean Tradition." They occur continuously and in low frequencies across the European landscape from MIS 14 onwards. Second, we reveal chronological patterning in Levallois technology, which reaches a height of popularity between MIS 6-4. In the future, more progress in understanding technological behavior during the Paleolithic will be made if we compare the properties of the lithics themselves across assemblages, rather than comparing assemblage types.
机译:由于研究人员提出了对穆斯特“技术复合体”的文化,功能和时间顺序的解释,最近的1970年代经典穆斯特辩论已经恢复。但是,这些解释可能会导致与四十年前一样的僵局。问题的根本原因是根据分类单位分析组合,无论它们是Bordian相还是Chaine操作技术复杂物,它们都会合并并掩盖多种可变性来源。在本文中,我们使用来自西欧中上新世的开挖良好,位置良好的地点的数据库跟踪随时间变化的关键岩性变量的变化。我们表明,按时间顺序排列的类型学和技术相所产生的信息很少,有助于阐明穆斯特变异性的原因。但是,当绘制组合中的各个岩性变量随时间变化时,就会出现新的变异性模式。我们的结果表明,双面不只是“ Acheulean”和“ Acheulean传统穆特”的特征。从MIS 14开始,它们在欧洲各地以低频连续发生。其次,我们揭示了Levallois技术中的按时间顺序排列的模式,这种模式在MIS 6-4之间达到了高度流行。将来,如果我们比较各个组件之间的岩石本身的属性,而不是比较各个组件的类型,将会在理解旧石器时代的技术行为方面取得更大的进步。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Quaternary International》 |2014年第6期|59-83|共25页
  • 作者单位

    Dept. of Anthropology, University of Minnesota, 395 Hubert Humphrey Center, 301 - 19th Ave. S., Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States;

    Dept. of Anthropology, University of Minnesota, 395 Hubert Humphrey Center, 301 - 19th Ave. S., Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Mousterian; Middle Paleolithic; Neanderthals; Lithics; Bifaces;

    机译:穆斯特中旧石器时代;尼安德特人道德;双面;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号