...
首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >Recycling bones in the Middle Pleistocene: Some reflections from Gran Dolina TD10-1 (Spain), Bolomor Cave (Spain) and Qesem Cave (Israel)
【24h】

Recycling bones in the Middle Pleistocene: Some reflections from Gran Dolina TD10-1 (Spain), Bolomor Cave (Spain) and Qesem Cave (Israel)

机译:中更新世的骨骼回收:来自Gran Dolina TD10-1(西班牙),Bolomor洞穴(西班牙)和Qesem洞穴(以色列)的一些反射

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Archaeologists can use different kinds of data to identify recycling. However, most approaches to recycling are based on lithic artefact attributes, especially on surface alterations, suggesting a period of discard between different events. Recycling can also be approached by means of faunal remains based on bone damage characteristics. Bone breakage processes, aimed at maximizing the nutritional value of consumed animals, generate a high number of small- and large-sized fragments, which are eventually discarded. Some of these are morphologically suitable for human use. It is necessary to distinguish between the use of bone as raw material from pre-existing very large-sized carcasses such as elephants (in cases where it is not certain if these had a nutritional purpose) and the recycling of fragments resulting from bone marrow extraction of smaller mammals that were obtained and consumed by human groups. In the first case, when the bones of a pre-existing elephant (including natural deaths) are exploited for tool making, the bones can be considered raw material, very similar to collecting stones as raw material for the lithic industry. In the second case, the bones of smaller mammals are selected to be used in a subsequent life cycle, after being broken for nutritional purposes and discarded. Here, we present some early cases of recycled bones from the Middle Pleistocene sites of Gran Dolina TD10-1 and Bolomor Cave in Spain and Qesem Cave in Israel. The studied elements appear to have been part of a previous faunal processing sequence (nutritional in nature), which were later discarded, and then used or modified for purposes other than the original ones. These fragments are dated to MIS 9 and show damage produced by use (retouched and unmodified soft retouchers) or shaped forms (bone artefacts). This study is an attempt to provide new data on recycling activities of faunal remains in the Middle Pleistocene and discuss the origin of this behaviour. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.
机译:考古学家可以使用不同种类的数据来识别回收。但是,大多数回收方法都是基于石器物属性,尤其是基于表面变化,这表明在不同事件之间存在一定的丢弃期。也可以通过基于骨骼损伤特征的动物遗骸来进行回收利用。旨在最大程度地消耗食用动物的营养价值的骨骼断裂过程会产生大量的小碎片和大碎片,最终将其丢弃。其中一些在形态上适合人类使用。有必要区分使用骨作为原料与已存在的非常大的尸体(例如大象)(如果不确定它们是否具有营养目的)和回收利用骨髓提取的碎片之间的区别人类群体获取和消耗的较小哺乳动物的数量。在第一种情况下,当利用已有大象的骨骼(包括自然死亡)进行工具制造时,这些骨骼可以被视为原材料,与收集石器作为石器业的原材料非常相似。在第二种情况下,选择较小的哺乳动物的骨头,然后出于营养目的折断并丢弃,以用于随后的生命周期。在这里,我们介绍了一些早期案例,这些案例是来自西班牙Gran Dolina TD10-1和Bolomor洞穴以及以色列Qesem洞穴的中更新世遗址的再生骨骼。所研究的元素似乎是先前动物加工序列的一部分(本质上是营养),后来被丢弃,然后出于原始目的以外的目的进行使用或修改。这些碎片的日期为MIS 9,显示使用(修饰和未修饰的软修饰剂)或成形形式(骨制品)产生的损坏。这项研究旨在提供有关中更新世动物遗体回收活动的新数据,并讨论这种行为的起源。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd和INQUA。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号