...
首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >Middle Palaeolithic land use in Dutch and Belgian Limburg: Integrating data from surface sites
【24h】

Middle Palaeolithic land use in Dutch and Belgian Limburg: Integrating data from surface sites

机译:荷兰和比利时林堡中部旧石器时代土地利用:整合地表数据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The European Middle Palaeolithic archaeological database is rich, but is biased towards evidence that originates in stratified sites. In many river catchments, prevalent and often ignored evidence for Middle Palaeolithic occupation is found in palimpsest lithic assemblages on the surface. By way of a case study, this paper addresses the problem of how to integrate lithic artifact assemblage data from such contexts to complement an often unbalanced picture of long-term land use. Analysis of a sample of Middle Palaeolithic surface assemblages from south-southwest facing edges of plateaus and terraces in Dutch and Belgian Limburg yields data suitable for comparison and integration with those from stratified assemblages associated with the wider Maas River valley floor. Sample size and artifact class diversity relationships account for sample size effects and numerically summarize patterns of inter-site fragmentation of core reduction sequences and differential artifact discard, arguably indicators of regional mobility and land use. Variability in artifact class diversity among assemblages also indicates differences in site occupational frequency. When viewed from a long-term diachronic perspective, integrated evidence from cumulative and spatial palimpsests suggests that land use behavior was complex, dynamic, and varied according to topographic factors in the research area. Lack of chronological resolution, variable site formation processes and conditions of artifact recovery complicate detailed interpretation of land use patterns. Despite these problems, results suggest that throughout the Middle Palaeolithic in the research area some plateau and terrace localities were 'persistent places' frequently re-occupied for a variety of purposes, while other similarly situated sites and localities more closely associated with river and stream valleys appear to have been occupied less frequently for a more limited range of activities. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.
机译:欧洲中古石器时代的考古数据库很丰富,但是偏向于分层地点的证据。在许多河流流域中,在表面上最暗淡的岩性组合中发现了中古石器时代占领的普遍且经常被忽略的证据。通过案例研究,本文解决了如何整合来自此类环境的石器物组合数据,以补充长期土地使用通常不平衡的情况。对荷兰和比利时林堡高原和阶地的西南偏南边缘的中古石器时代表面组合样本进行分析,得出的数据适合与来自与更广阔的马斯河谷底相关的分层组合的数据进行比较和整合。样本数量和工件类别多样性关系解释了样本数量的影响,并在数值上总结了核心缩减序列和差异人工产物丢弃的站点间碎片化模式,可以说是区域流动性和土地利用的指标。组件之间工件类别多样性的差异也表明站点职业频率存在差异。从长期历时的观点来看,来自累积性和空间性麻痹的综合证据表明,土地利用行为是复杂的,动态的,并且根据研究区域的地形因素而变化。缺乏时间分辨率,可变的地块形成过程以及人工制品恢复的条件使对土地利用模式的详细解释变得复杂。尽管存在这些问题,结果表明,在研究区的整个中古石器时代,一些高原和梯田地区经常被“永久地占据”,以用于各种目的,而其他位置相似的地区和地区则与河谷和溪流谷紧密相关。似乎在较少的活动范围内较少被占用。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd和INQUA。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号