...
首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >The pattern of Neolithization in Dakhleh Oasis in the Eastern Sahara
【24h】

The pattern of Neolithization in Dakhleh Oasis in the Eastern Sahara

机译:撒哈拉沙漠东部Dakhleh绿洲的新石器时代格局

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Neolithic, characterized by V.G. Childe as a critical turning point in the human chronicle, entailed a major economic change, the domestication of plants and animals, plus accompanying changes in settlement patterns, technologies and ideology. Once fully developed in the Near East, it was spread to Europe and a few spots on the North African coast by colonists carrying the full 'Neolithic package'. But for most of North Africa, Neolithization consisted of indigenous groups choosing elements of the Neolithic package most appropriate to the local environment. In northeastern Africa, colonies with the full package may have been established at Merimde in the Nile Delta, and perhaps in the Fayum, but beyond that, the spread seems to have been by cultural diffusion. For the Egyptian Western Desert, the evidence from Dakhleh Oasis suggests that livestock, which arrived independently of the rest of the package, was the only element of the Near Eastern Neolithic to be accepted. Otherwise, the post-Pleistocene adaptation seems to have been an indigenous development, rooted in the local natural environment. This environment was basically a desert, better-watered in the early to mid-Holocene, but even then subject to short arid episodes. Subsistence consisted of hunting and intensively exploiting rich stands of wild African cereals such as sorghum, plus legumes and fruits. 'Neolithic' technologies were developed locally, independently of the Near East, to exploit these resources. Pottery with impressed decoration, for instance, appeared in the southern part of the desert at the beginning of the Holocene, and gradually moved northward into the Egyptian desert where it may have inspired a new undecorated pottery tradition. Bifacially-knapped implements like arrowheads and knives are different enough from their Near Eastern equivalents in form, dimensions and production sequences that they arguably were developed locally, starting in the early-Holocene. Dakhleh witnessed two episodes of increased sedentism, one in the early Holocene in response to an arid episode, the second in the mid-Holocene, under quite favourable rainfall conditions. These episodes transformed the original hunter-gatherer groups socially and ideologically to the point where they could readily accept livestock when it arrived, and started them on the road to increased social complexity. The onset of aridification ca. 7250 cal BP forced the oasis-dwellers out of their settled sites. The flocks and herds of the now-mobile groups remained, in the African pattern, a relatively minor element within a multi-resource pastoralism. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.
机译:新石器时代,以V.G.柴尔德(Childe)是人类编年史的关键转折点,它带来了重大的经济变化,动植物的驯化,以及随之而来的定居方式,技术和意识形态的变化。一旦在近东完全发展起来,它就会被殖民者携带完整的“新石器时代的包裹”传播到欧洲和北非海岸的一些地方。但是,对于北非大部分地区而言,新石器时代由土著群体组成,他们选择了最适合当地环境的新石器时代配套产品。在非洲东北部,也许已经在尼罗河三角洲的梅里姆德以及也许在法伊姆建立了完整的殖民地,但除此之外,传播似乎是由于文化传播。对于埃及西部沙漠,达克勒·绿洲的证据表明,与其余包裹无关的牲畜是近东新石器时代唯一被接受的元素。否则,更新世后的适应似乎是植根于当地自然环境的本土发展。这种环境基本上是一片沙漠,在全新世早期至中期浇灌得更好,但即便如此,也经历了短暂的干旱。维持生计包括狩猎和集中开采丰富的野生非洲谷物,例如高粱,豆类和水果。 “新石器时代”技术是在本地独立于近东开发的,以开发这些资源。例如,全新世初期,沙漠南部出现了装饰精美的陶器,然后逐渐向北移动到埃及沙漠,这可能激发了一种新的未经装饰的陶器传统。诸如箭头和刀之类的双面工具在形式,尺寸和生产顺序上与近东同等产品相差甚远,因此可以说它们是从全新世初期开始在本地开发的。达克勒(Dakhleh)目睹了两次久坐不动的现象,其中一次是在全新世早期对干旱的反应,第二次是在全新世中期,当时降雨条件十分有利。这些事件在社会和意识形态上改变了原始的狩猎采集者群体,使他们可以在牲畜到达时随时接受它们,并开始了他们向社会复杂性发展的道路。干旱化的开始7250 cal BP迫使绿洲居民离开他们的定居点。在非洲模式下,现在流动的群体的羊群仍然是多资源牧民中相对较小的部分。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd和INQUA。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号