...
首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >Did prehistoric foragers behave in an economically irrational manner? Raw material availability and technological organisation at the early Gravettian site of Willendorf II (Austria)
【24h】

Did prehistoric foragers behave in an economically irrational manner? Raw material availability and technological organisation at the early Gravettian site of Willendorf II (Austria)

机译:史前觅食者的行为是否在经济上不合理? Willendorf II(奥地利)早期Gravettian工厂的原材料供应和技术组织

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Willendorf II provides the longest and best-studied MIS 3 sequence in the Middle Danube region, and represents one of the key reference sequences for this time period in Central Europe. The assemblage chosen for analysis derives from archaeological horizon (AH) 5, attributed to the period of the first Gravettian between 30 and 27 ka uncal. BP. Previous analyses were all based on a selected inventory (mainly tools and cores) derived from the 1908/1909 excavations. The discovery of labelled wooden boxes containing numerous additional artefacts from the 1908/1909 excavations at the end of the 1990s in the cellar of the Natural History Museum in Vienna considerably raises the total number of finds for all archaeological horizons, and opens new perspectives for investigating Upper Palaeolithic behavioural variability in the Middle Danube region. For the first time, all artefacts have been assigned to a raw material source area, thus providing a picture of the geographic extent of the foraging territory, and allowing for quantified observations on raw material economy and technological variability in the early Gravettian of the Middle Danube region. Willendorf II provides an excellent basis for the study of Gravettian lithic assemblage variability due to the wide array of local and nonlocal lithic resources available at varying distances from the settlement. Source provenance information and patterns of raw material use offer complementary measures of mobility. We discuss the results in the light of the concepts of "technological provisioning" developed by S.L. Kuhn. Distance to source alone is not suitable to predict and explain raw material frequencies and the character of transported technologies on nonlocal material at Willendorf II-AH5. We argue that other factors such as the degree of anticipation of foreseeable activities and occupation span might account for the observed economic patterns. Our results clearly have broader relevance for understanding assemblage variability in the Gravettian of Central Europe and further afield. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.
机译:Willendorf II提供了多瑙河中部地区最长,研究最多的MIS 3序列,并且代表了这一时期中欧的关键参考序列之一。选择进行分析的组合来自考古学视野(AH)5,这归因于30到27 ka uncal的第一个Gravettian时期。 BP。先前的分析都是基于从1908/1909年的挖掘工作中选择的清单(主要是工具和岩心)。 1990年代末,在维也纳自然历史博物馆的地窖中发现了带有标记的木箱,这些木箱中包含1908/1909年发掘的大量其他文物,这极大地提高了所有考古视野的发现物总数,并为研究提供了新的视角多瑙河中部地区上古石器时代的行为变异性。第一次,所有人工制品都被分配到了原料来源区域,从而提供了觅食区域的地理范围的图片,并允许对多瑙河中部格列维提早期的原料经济和技术变化进行定量观察。区域。 Willendorf II为研究Gravettian岩性组合变化提供了极好的基础,这是因为距离定居点不同距离的地方和非本地岩性资源种类繁多。源出处信息和原材料使用方式提供了流动性的补充度量。我们根据S.L.开发的“技术配置”的概念来讨论结果。库恩在Willendorf II-AH5上,仅靠源头的距离不适合预测和解释原材料频率以及非本地材料上运输技术的特性。我们认为,其他因素,例如对可预见活动的预期程度和职业跨度,可能是观察到的经济模式的原因。我们的结果显然对理解中欧和更远地区的格拉维特人的装配变异性具有更广泛的相关性。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd和INQUA。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号