...
首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >Variability of Late Gravettian lithic industries in southern Poland: A case study of the Krakow Spadzista and Jaksice II sites
【24h】

Variability of Late Gravettian lithic industries in southern Poland: A case study of the Krakow Spadzista and Jaksice II sites

机译:波兰南部晚期Gravettian石器产业的变异性:以克拉科夫Spadzista和Jaksice II遗址为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article summarizes archaeological data obtained from two Late Gravettian assemblages discovered at Krakow Spadzista and Jaksice II sites. At the Krakow Spadzista site different tool types in each zone were discovered, what could be a reflection of the varied activities carried out on each part of the site. From the other hand at Jaksice cite a homogeneous lithic assemblage, with a predominance of the armatures was discovered. These two inventories differ fundamentally both in terms of the raw materials used, tool-making technologies, as well as the lithic typology and morphology. These dissimilarities could be observed not only between above mentioned sites, but also among other Late Gravettian localities known from Central Europe and they concern primarily retouched tool assemblages. This leads us to conclude that in this period we could observe a mosaic of dissimilar inventories, but - at least at the current stage of research - they do not define any group of sites either geographically or chronologically. Whether this is the reflection of cultural diversity or seasonally varied assemblages used by Palaeolithic hunter-gatherers we can not unriddle. We could only state that the problem is most complicated, and needs more detailed studies focused not only on the lithic artefacts, but also on faunal remains, chronology, and paleoenvironmental reconstruction. Only the correlation of all this data can bring us closer to solving the problem of the diversification of the Late Gravettian industries. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.
机译:本文总结了从克拉科夫Spadzista和Jaksice II遗址中发现的两个晚Gravettian组合获得的考古数据。在克拉科夫Spadzista站点发现了每个区域中不同的工具类型,这可能反映了站点每个部分所进行的各种活动。另一方面,在雅克西斯(Jaksice),人们发现了以电枢为主导的均质石器组合。在所使用的原材料,工具制造技术以及石器类型和形态方面,这两个清单在根本上是不同的。这些差异不仅可以在上述站点之间观察到,而且可以在中欧已知的其他Gravettian后裔站点中观察到,它们主要涉及修饰过的工具组合。这使我们得出结论,在此期间,我们可以观察到大量不同的库存,但是-至少在当前研究阶段-他们没有在地理上或时间上定义任何地点。无论是反映文化多样性还是旧石器时代的狩猎采集者所使用的季节性变化的集合,我们都不能忘记。我们只能说这个问题最复杂,需要进行更详细的研究,不仅要关注石器物,还要关注动物遗存,年代和古环境的重建。只有所有这些数据的相关性,才能使我们更接近解决Gravettian晚期产业多样化的问题。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd和INQUA。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号