...
首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >The last hunter-gatherers of China and Africa: A life amongst pastoralists and farmers
【24h】

The last hunter-gatherers of China and Africa: A life amongst pastoralists and farmers

机译:中国和非洲的最后一个狩猎采集者:牧民和农民之间的生活

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The transition to farming is often written in the language of progress. The search has been for the oldest sedentary farming settlements, the processes of plant and animals domestication and the profound societal alterations that accompanied the choice to change lifeway. Perhaps because most of us come from long-standing farmer ancestry, we tend to assume that farming is a superior and more secure way of life. Is there any data to support this? Evidence from southern Africa since the 1970s has shown that the Kalahari hunter-gatherers living in what is a comparatively harsh environment have/had a relatively easier life, with considerably more leisure time and a longer life expectancy than those living in early farmer groups (Lee and DeVore, 1976). Many hunter-gatherers in East Asia will have had even more comfortable and leisure filled lives than those of the Kalahari Bushmen. It is therefore important to ask the question as to why East Asian hunter-gatherers took up farming and whether all hunter-gatherer groups made this choice swiftly and willingly. I use evidence from studies into hunter-gatherer interactions with farmers in sub-saharan Africa to consider this question. It was originally hoped that groups such as the Bushmen of southern Africa, the Pygmies of central Africa and the Hadza/Sandawe of East Africa could give us glimpses into a universal hunter-gatherer past. Revisionist studies since the 1970s have sought to undermine this hope and have emphasised that early research recorded the end product of at least two millennia of interaction, influence and change from being amongst pastoralists and farmers. Archaeology has made significant contributions to this debate, providing evidence for the nature and extent of interaction, continuity and change. Today we are therefore well-positioned to consider the specifics of how hunter-gatherer groups responded to the coming of livestock keepers and farmers in different parts of Africa. This paper will review African interaction models so as to consider their implications for East Asia. I do not provide a general model for interaction, indeed I would be ideologically opposed to any attempt at this kind of universalism, but I seek to provide a convincing glimpse of the kinds of real-world complexity and contextuality in the choices made by East Asian hunter-gatherers in their responses to the presence and influence of farmers.
机译:向农业的过渡通常用进步的语言来写。人们一直在寻找最古老的久坐定居点,动植物的驯养过程以及伴随着改变生活方式的选择的深刻的社会变革。也许因为我们大多数人都来自悠久的农民血统,所以我们倾向于认为农业是一种优越且更安全的生活方式。是否有任何数据可以支持这一点?自1970年代以来南部非洲的证据表明,生活在相对恶劣的环境中的Kalahari狩猎者/人们的生活相对/更加轻松,与生活在早期农民团体中的人们相比,他们拥有更多的休闲时间和更长的寿命(Lee和DeVore,1976年)。与卡拉哈里丛林人相比,东亚许多狩猎采集者的生活将更加舒适和休闲。因此,重要的是要问一个问题,即东亚的狩猎采集者为什么要从事农业活动,以及所有的狩猎采集者群体是否都迅速而自愿地做出了这一选择。我使用来自撒哈拉以南非洲农民与狩猎者-采集者互动研究的证据来考虑这个问题。最初希望诸如南部非洲的布什曼,中部非洲的y格米人和东非的哈扎/桑达威等组织能够使我们瞥见一个普遍的狩猎采集者的过去。自1970年代以来的修正主义研究试图破坏这种希望,并强调指出,早期的研究记录了至少两千年以来牧民和农民之间的互动,影响和变化的最终产物。考古学为这场辩论做出了重要贡献,为相互作用,连续性和变化的性质和程度提供了证据。因此,今天,我们处于有利位置,可以考虑猎人与采集者群体如何应对非洲不同地区的牲畜饲养者和农民的到来。本文将回顾非洲的互动模式,以考虑它们对东亚的影响。我没有提供互动的通用模型,实际上我在意识形态上会反对任何尝试这种普遍主义的尝试,但我试图提供令人信服的一眼,以了解东亚做出的选择中的各种现实世界的复杂性和背景性。捕猎者对农民的存在和影响的回应。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Quaternary International》 |2018年第30期|121-129|共9页
  • 作者

    Benjamin Smith;

  • 作者单位

    Centre for Rock Art Research and Management, University of Western Australia,Rock Art Research Institute, University of the Witwatersrand;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号