...
首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >Food or fibercraft? Grinding stones and Aboriginal use of Triodia grass (spinifex)
【24h】

Food or fibercraft? Grinding stones and Aboriginal use of Triodia grass (spinifex)

机译:食物还是纤维工艺品? Triodia草(spinifex)的磨石和原住民用途

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Plant tissue and wooden objects are rare in the Australian archaeological record but distinctive stone tools such as grinding stones and ground-edge hatchets are relatively common, and they provide strong indirect evidence for plant food processing and woodworking, respectively. Ethnohistorical references to the Aboriginal use of stone tools for technologies related to fibercraft, basketry, hafting adhesives and fixative sealants (with gum, wax and resin) are also rare but all these tasks were probably more common than records indicate. Here we consider ethnohistorical evidence for stones in fibercraft and the processing of Triodia grass (spinifex) as a case study. We compare functional traces on experimental stones with traces on a museum specimen (CMAA 1926.591), which was collected ethnohistorically and reportedly used for 'grinding spinifex leaves'. Residues and other traces on the museum specimen are consistent with both fiber-processing and seed grinding. We suggest that it may be difficult for usewear and residue analysis to determine if grinding stones were used to target Triodia spinifex for fiber, food or another particular plant product. Further experimental research is needed to refine criteria for identifying archaeological fiber-processing tools. However, we propose that the combination of traces previously interpreted as seed processing on bedrock grinding patches and portable grinding stones may also indicate the processing of Triodia spinifex for fiber. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.
机译:植物组织和木质物品在澳大利亚考古记录中很少见,但独特的石器工具(例如,磨石和地斧)则相对常见,它们分别为植物食品加工和木工提供了有力的间接证据。关于纤维工具,编织物,柄接粘合剂和固定密封剂(含胶,蜡和树脂)相关技术的原住民使用石材工具的民族历史记载也很少见,但所有这些任务可能比记录所表明的更为普遍。在这里,我们以人类历史证据为例,研究纤维飞机中的石头和Triodia草(spinifex)的加工过程。我们将实验性石头上的功能性痕迹与博物馆标本上的痕迹(CMAA 1926.591)进行了比较,该样本是根据民族史收集的,据说用于“研磨菠菜叶”。博物馆标本上的残留物和其他痕迹与纤维加工和种子研磨都一致。我们建议使用磨损和残留物分析来确定是否使用磨石来将Triodia spinifex用作纤维,食品或其他特定植物产品可能是困难的。需要进一步的实验研究,以完善识别考古纤维加工工具的标准。但是,我们建议将先前解释为在基岩研磨斑块和便携式研磨石上进行种子加工的痕迹结合起来,也可能表明对Triodia spinifex进行了纤维加工。 (c)2016 Elsevier Ltd和INQUA。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号