...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychology & Health >Fidelity of delivery of a physical activity intervention: Predictors and consequences
【24h】

Fidelity of delivery of a physical activity intervention: Predictors and consequences

机译:进行体育活动干预的保真度:预测因素和后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Assessing fidelity of behavioural interventions is important, but demanding and rarely done. This study assessed adherence to behaviour change techniques used in an intervention to increase physical activity among sedentary adults (ProActive; N = 365). Transcripts of 108 sessions with a sub-sample of 27 participants were assessed. An independent assessor coded adherence of four 'facilitators' who delivered the intervention to 208 protocol-specified facilitator behaviours (e.g. 'elicit perceived advantages of becoming more active') in four key sessions. Four raters classified the 208 behaviours under 14 techniques (e.g., goal setting, use of rewards) to enable calculation of adherence to techniques. Observed adherence to techniques across participants was modest (median 44%, IQR 35-62%), and lower than that reported by facilitators. Adherence differed between facilitators (range: 26-63%) and decreased across the four sessions (mean drop 9% per session, 95% confidence interval 7-11%). In this small sample facilitator adherence was unrelated to (change in) participants' physical activity or its cognitive predictors: Attitudes, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control and intention. Future research should investigate causal pathways between fidelity indicators and outcomes in larger samples and develop and test less intensive measures of fidelity.
机译:评估行为干预的逼真度很重要,但要求很高且很少这样做。这项研究评估了对习惯行为改变技术的依从性,该技术用于增加久坐的成年人身体活动的干预措施中(ProActive; N = 365)。评估了108个会话的笔录,并抽取了27个参与者的子样本。一个独立的评估员对四个``促进者''的依从性进行了编码,他们在四个关键环节中将干预措施提供给208个协议指定的促进者行为(例如,``获得了变得更加积极的感知优势'')。四个评分者根据14种技术(例如目标设定,奖励使用)对208种行为进行了分类,以计算对技术的依从性。观察到参与者对技术的依从性中等(中位数为44%,IQR为35-62%),低于主持人报告的水平。促进者之间的依从性有所不同(范围:26-63%),并且在四个疗程中均降低(平均每疗程下降9%,95%的置信区间为7-11%)。在这个小样本中,促进者的依从性与参与者的体育活动(或其变化)或其认知预测指标无关(态度,主观规范,感知的行为控制和意图)。未来的研究应调查较大样本中保真度指标与结果之间的因果关系,并开发和测试强度较低的保真度度量。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Psychology & Health》 |2008年第1期|11-24|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SR UK;

    Department of Psychology, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB UK;

    Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YF UK;

    Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SR UK;

    Department of Psychology, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB UK;

    Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SR UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Intervention studies; fidelity; behaviour change techniques; physical activity;

    机译:干预研究;保真行为改变技巧;体力活动;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号