...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychological Bulletin >Are associative and propositional processes qualitatively distinct? Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006)
【24h】

Are associative and propositional processes qualitatively distinct? Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006)

机译:关联过程和命题过程在质量上有区别吗?对Gawronski和Bodenhausen(2006)的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The authors comment on B. Gawronski and G. V. Bodenhausen's (2006) associative-propositional evaluation model of implicit and explicit attitudes by examining the claims that (a) truth value is attached to propositions but not to associations; (b) pattern activation is qualitatively different from syllogistic structure of arguments; and (c) Pavlovian conditioning may be propositional, whereas evaluative conditioning is not. They conclude that despite surface dissimilarities between implicit and explicit attitudes both may be mediated by the same underlying process.
机译:作者通过考察以下主张,对B. Gawronski和G. V. Bodenhausen(2006)的隐含和显式态度的联想命题评估模型进行了评论:(a)真值附加在命题而非关联上; (b)模式激活在质量上与论证的三段式结构不同; (c)巴甫洛夫条件可能是命题,而评价条件则不是。他们得出结论,尽管内隐态度和外显态度之间存在表面差异,但两者都可能由相同的潜在过程来介导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号