...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychological Bulletin >Personality traits change in adulthood: Reply to Costa and McCrae (2006)
【24h】

Personality traits change in adulthood: Reply to Costa and McCrae (2006)

机译:人格特质在成年期的变化:回复科斯塔和麦克莱(2006)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a response to P. T. Costa, Jr., and R. R. McCrae (2006), the authors show that Costa and McCrae's writings on personality suggest a belief in immutability of personality traits. The authors agree with Costa and McCrae that new personality trait models that provide an accurate lower order structure of personality traits are Deeded and explain why the Revised NEO Personality Inventory is not the correct model for that purpose. The authors provide direct evidence refuting the hypothesis that personality traits change only because of biologically based intrinsic maturation. The authors present arguments supporting the contention that meta-analyses should be preferred to single longitudinal studies when drawing inferences about general patterns of personality development. Finally, the authors point out why the differences between their position and Costa and McCrae's are important.
机译:在对P. T. Costa,Jr.和R. R. McCrae(2006)的回应中,作者表明,Costa和McCrae关于人格的著作暗示了对人格特质不变性的信念。作者同意Costa和McCrae的观点,他们提出了新的人格特征模型,该模型提供了准确的人格特征的低阶结构,并解释了为什么经修订的NEO人格清单不是为此目的的正确模型。作者提供了直接的证据,驳斥了人格特质仅因生物学基础的内在成熟而改变的假说。作者提出了支持以下论点的论点,即在得出关于人格发展的一般模式的推论时,荟萃分析应优于单项纵向研究。最后,作者指出为什么他们的立场与Costa和McCrae的立场之间的差异很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号