...
首页> 外文期刊>Postcolonial Studies >The cultural logic of a capitalist single-party state, Singapore
【24h】

The cultural logic of a capitalist single-party state, Singapore

机译:资本主义一党制国家新加坡的文化逻辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Singapore is a settler nation in which the majority population is descended not from White colonizers but from Chinese migrants. Being without proprietary claim to the land, the new postcolonial island-nation declared itself a constitutional ‘multiracial’ nation of Huaren, Malays and Indians, without the isomorphism of race, culture and nation. Lacking a pre-colonial political structure, the new nation was constituted on the template of a modern nation-state, with all the liberal rights and freedoms that this implies, and where the government is to be established by popular mandate through periodic general elections. Operating within the political space framed by these two conditions, the People's Action Party—which has governed without effective opposition since 1959—has been able to manoeuvre between the logic of individual competition in the capitalist economy and the logic of equality between racial groups in social and cultural administration, pragmatically privileging one set of rationales over the other as the situation requires. Thus, the ideology of meritocracy is emphasized in the kinds of individual competition that determine and allocate educational and economic opportunities, thus individualizing economic success or failure. On the other hand, equality of race is emphasized in the management of cultural policies and in the administering and policing of race relations, including the suppression of conventional claims for redress made by racial groups which consider themselves discriminated against or marginalized. Racial harmony as a public moral good is evoked as an instrument for the management of race rather than as an arena for deepening the understanding and mixing of cultures. These strictures of the single-party state disrupt the universalizing desire of contemporary liberalism propagated by the West, providing other East Asian nations with the possibility of an alternative mode of capitalist development without a multi-party polity.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2010.518347
机译:新加坡是一个移民国家,其多数人口不是白人殖民者的后裔,而是中国移民的后裔。由于没有土地所有权,这个新的后殖民岛国宣布自己是华人,马来人和印第安人的宪法“多种族”国家,没有种族,文化和民族的同构。由于缺乏前殖民时期的政治结构,新国家是建立在一个现代民族国家的模板上的,它具有这意味着的所有自由权利和自由,并且政府将由人民授权通过定期大选建立。自从1959年以来一直没有有效反对的执政的人民行动党,在这两个条件所构架的政治空间中运作,已经能够在资本主义经济中的个人竞争逻辑与种族群体之间的平等逻辑之间做出调整在社会和文化行政管理领域,根据情况需要,务实地将一套理论置于另一种理论之上。因此,在决定和分配教育和经济机会,从而个体化经济成败的个体竞争中,强调了精英管理的意识形态。另一方面,在文化政策的管理以及种族关系的管理和维持治安中强调种族平等,包括压制认为自己受到歧视或边缘化的种族群体对补救的传统主张。种族和谐作为一种公共道德品,被认为是管理种族的工具,而不是加深对文化的理解和融合的场所。一党制国家的这些局面破坏了西方传播的当代自由主义的普遍愿望,为其他东亚国家提供了一种无需多党政体的资本主义发展方式的可能性。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2010.518347

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号