首页> 外文期刊>Population, Space and Place >Counterurbanisation and Rural Gentrification: an Exploration of the Terms
【24h】

Counterurbanisation and Rural Gentrification: an Exploration of the Terms

机译:反城市化和农村绅士化:术语探索

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper examines the interrelationships between the concepts of counterurbanisation and rural gentrification, suggesting that four different positions can be identified. Firstly, these concepts are highly commensurable and could usefully be more closely aligned. Secondly, rural gentrification has a political/critical dimension that is missing from conceptualisations of counterurbanisation, and hence rural gentrification might usefully displace counterurbanisation as a focus of study. Thirdly, counterurbanisation is a less reductionist concept than rural gentrification, and therefore counterurbanisation researchers need to disentangle themselves from too great a focus on rural gentrification. Fourthly, both concepts share many problematic features and may both be viewed as chaotic concepts. The paper then discusses how counterurbanisation and gentrification researchers have responded to criticisms relating to their conceptual foci, suggesting that these can be characterised as legislative or interpretive. It is argued that whilst the former response has been predominant, there are signs that the latter approach is also being adopted. The concluding part of the paper draws on the notion of an interpretive approach to understanding counterurbanisation and rural gentrification, and their interrelationships. Use is made of Latour's notion of 'circulatory sociologies of translation' to consider how the two concepts are linked not only to their rnobjects of study but also to social relationships with other academics, with governmental organisations and with public opinion and values. Attention is drawn to the differential relationships that counterurbanisation and rural gentrification are implicated in, and how this might account for the differential character of the two concepts.
机译:本文研究了反城市化和农村绅士化概念之间的相互关系,暗示可以确定四个不同的立场。首先,这些概念具有很高的可比性,可以更紧密地结合在一起。其次,农村高档化具有反城市化概念所缺少的政治/批判性维度,因此,农村高档化可能会有效地取代反城市化,成为研究的重点。第三,反城市化的概念比农村绅士化的还原主义要少,因此反城市化研究者需要摆脱对农村绅士化的过多关注。第四,这两个概念都有许多有问题的特征,并且都可以看作是混乱的概念。然后,本文讨论了反城市化和高级化研究人员如何回应对其概念焦点的批评,并提出可以将其描述为立法或解释性特征。有人认为,尽管前者的反应占主导地位,但有迹象表明后者的方法也正在被采用。本文的最后部分借鉴了一种解释方法的概念,以理解反城市化和农村绅士化及其相互关系。利用拉图尔(Latour)的“翻译循环社会学”的概念来考虑这两个概念如何不仅与他们的研究对象相联系,而且如何与其他学者,政府组织以及舆论和价值观之间的社会关系联系起来。请注意与反城市化和农村绅士化有关的不同关系,以及如何解释这两个概念的不同特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号