...
首页> 外文期刊>OCLC Systems and Services >Check-listing digital objects in context
【24h】

Check-listing digital objects in context

机译:检查上下文中的数字对象

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to discuss phenomena in publishing that usually escape recognition. The aim of the research is to address exclusionary practices surrounding digital objects, including those in open access journals. Design/methodology/approach The subject scope focuses on digital objects and how their contexts come to matter in open-ended processes of "metadating". The new concept of a digital object in context (doic) marks the difference between an author's file and the metadata work undertaken on it. The theoretical scope of the paper is feminist technoscience. An analogy to piezoelectric transducer technology in ultrasonography (Barad) is transferred to the context at hand. Barad's concept of "apparatus" is employed to shed new light on publishing. Findings - The paper finds that contextual metadata should be given due attention. Metadata may show exclusionary practices that need reconsideration. Research limitations/implications - Technology is closely intertwined with technoscientific issues and user perspectives. Yet, user perspectives are not all there is to publishing. Future research might address if exclusionary practices in publishing differ from one scientific community to another. Practical implications The analytical distinction between a file and its metadata serves to get a digital object on the track to better visibility. The provisional checklist helps reconsider current practices in publishing. Originality/value - The paper infuses the open access debate with current technoscientific research and introduces Karan Barad's concept of "apparatus" to a wider audience. To research authors this paper gives crucial information for the placement decisions of their upcoming articles. For readers and innovative publishing initiatives the checklist is helpful for reflecting one's own practices. For anyone concerned with research publishing, including commercial enterprises as well as library and information scientists, the new concept of a doic generates ideas when linked to research communication as being first and foremost an economy based on gift giving for recognition.
机译:目的-本文的目的是讨论通常无法识别的出版现象。该研究的目的是解决围绕数字对象(包括开放存取期刊中的对象)的排他性做法。设计/方法/方法本主题的重点是数字对象,以及它们的上下文如何在开放式“中介”过程中发挥作用。上下文中的数字对象的新概念(Doic)标志着作者文件与在其上进行的元数据工作之间的区别。本文的理论范围是女权主义技术科学。与超声检查中的压电换能器技术(Barad)类似,已转移到当前的环境中。巴拉德(Barad)的“设备”概念为出版业提供了新的思路。结论-本文发现应该适当注意上下文元数据。元数据可能显示了需要重新考虑的排他性做法。研究的局限性/意义-技术与技术科学问题和用户观点密切相关。但是,用户观点并不是发布的全部内容。未来的研究可能会解决出版中的排他性实践是否在一个科学界与另一个科学界不同的问题。实际意义文件及其元数据之间的分析区别有助于使轨道上的数字对象具有更好的可视性。临时清单有助于重新考虑当前的发布惯例。原创性/价值-本文将开放访问的辩论与当前的技术科学研究结合起来,并向更多的读者介绍了Karan Barad的“设备”概念。对于研究作者,本文为他们即将发表的文章的放置决策提供了重要信息。对于读者和创新的出版计划,清单有助于反映自己的做法。对于与研究出版有关的任何人,包括商业企业以及图书馆和信息科学家,doic的新概念在与研究交流联系在一起时就会产生想法,因为它首先是基于礼物捐赠的经济。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号