首页> 外文期刊>Marine Geodesy >Accuracy Assessment of the TOPEX/Poseidon Ionosphere Measurements
【24h】

Accuracy Assessment of the TOPEX/Poseidon Ionosphere Measurements

机译:TOPEX /波塞冬电离层测量的准确性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We conducted an assessment of the TOPEX dual-frequency nadir ionosphere observations in the TOPEX/Poseidon (T/P) GDR by comparing TOPEX with the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) Global Ionosphere Map (G1M), the climato-logical model IRI200J, and the DORIS (onboard T/P) relative ionosphere delays. We investigated the TOPEX (TOPEX Side A and TOPEX Side B altimeters, TSA and TSB, respectively) ionosphere observations for the time period 1995-2001, covering periods of low, intermediate, and high solar activity. Here, we use absolute path delays (at Ku-band frequency of the TOPEX altimeter and with positive signs) rather than Total Electron Content (TEC). We found significant biases between GIM and TOPEX (GIM-TOPEX) nadir ionosphere path delays: -8.1 ± 0.4 mm formal uncertainties and equivalent to 3.7 TECu) and -9.0 ± 0.7 mm (4.1 TECu) for TSA and TSB, respectively, indicating that the TOPEX path delay is longer (or with higher TECu) than GIM. The estimated relative biases vary with latitude and with daytime or nighttime passes. The estimated biases in the path delays (DORIS-TOPEX) are: -10.9 ± 0.4 mm (5.0 TECu) and -14.8 ± 0.6mm (6.7 TECu), for TSA and TSB, respectively. There is a distinct jump of the DORIS path delays (-3.9 ±0.7 mm, TSA delays longer than TSB delays) at the TSB altimeter switch in February 1999, presumably due to inconsistent DORIS processing. The origin of the bias between GIM (GPS, L-band) and TOPEX (radar altimeter, Ku-band) is currently unknown and warrants further investigation. Finally, the estimated drift rates between GIM and TSA, DORIS and TSA ionosphere path delays for the 6-year study span are -0.4 mm/yr and -0.8 mm/yr, respectively, providing a possible error bound for the TOPEX/Poseidon sea level observations during periods of low and intermediate solar activity.
机译:我们通过将TOPEX与欧洲轨道确定中心(CODE)全球电离层地图(G1M),气候学模型进行了比较,对TOPEX /波塞冬(T / P)GDR中的TOPEX双频最低点电离层观测进行了评估IRI200J和DORIS(机载T / P)相对电离层延迟。我们调查了1995-2001年TOPEX(TOPEX A侧和TOPEX B侧高度计,分别为TSA和TSB)电离层观测值,涵盖了太阳活动的低,中和高时间。在这里,我们使用绝对路径延迟(在TOPEX高度计的Ku频段频率上并带有正号),而不是总电子含量(TEC)。我们发现GIM和TOPEX(GIM-TOPEX)天底电离层路径延迟之间存在明显偏差:TSA和TSB分别为-8.1±0.4 mm形式不确定度和等效于3.7 TECu)和-9.0±0.7 mm(4.1 TECu),这表明TOPEX路径延迟比GIM更长(或具有更高的TECu)。估计的相对偏差随纬度以及白天或夜间通行证而变化。对于TSA和TSB,路径延迟的估计偏差(DORIS-TOPEX)分别为:-10.9±0.4 mm(5.0 TECu)和-14.8±0.6mm(6.7 TECu)。 1999年2月,TSB高度计切换处DORIS路径延迟(-3.9±0.7毫米,TSA延迟比TSB延迟更长)明显跳变,这可能是由于DORIS处理不一致造成的。目前尚不清楚GIM(GPS,L波段)和TOPEX(雷达高度计,Ku波段)之间的偏差的起因,有待进一步研究。最后,在为期6年的研究中,GIM与TSA,DORIS和TSA电离层路径延迟之间的估计漂移率分别为-0.4 mm / yr和-0.8 mm / yr,这为TOPEX / Poseidon海提供了可能的误差范围太阳活动处于中低水平期间的水平观测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号