首页> 外文期刊>Marine ecology >Assessing the ecological status of the North-western Adriatic Sea within the European Water Framework Directive: a comparison of Bentix, AMBI and M-AMBI methods
【24h】

Assessing the ecological status of the North-western Adriatic Sea within the European Water Framework Directive: a comparison of Bentix, AMBI and M-AMBI methods

机译:评估欧洲水框架指令中西北亚得里亚海的生态状况:Bentix,AMBI和M-AMBI方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper we looked for the most suitable method for benthic ecological quality status (EcoQS) assessment of the North-western Adriatic Sea. Taking into account the historical and present information, we inter-compared our expectations in terms of EcoQS, with the Bentix, AMBI and M-AMBI classification metrics results, and investigated the sensitivity of these indices to the spatial, seasonal and inter-annual variability of benthic communities. The sampling sites were located at increasing distances with respect to the Po River mouth, along an (inverse) gradient of eutrophication. Moreover, a 2-year monthly monitoring plan (October 2004-September 2006) was carried out at the CEBEB site, located in a central position with respect to the investigated area. The results highlighted that the three indices differed in the sensitivity to spatial and temporal variability of the benthic communities. The strong seasonal and inter-annual changes in the benthic communities had a significant effect on the Bentix, whereas no relevant modifications were observed on the EcoQS assignation obtained using the M-AMBI and AMBI methods. The environmental quality ratios (EQR) values and EcoQS classification obtained by the Bentix and AMBI did not match expectations, as they were not inversely correlated with the site distances with respect to the Po mouth, whereas the M-AMBI clearly discriminated the most and the least eutrophicated sites. It thus appears that the M-AMBI could be considered to be the most valuable method for the ecological-status assessment of the North-western Adriatic Sea benthic ecosystem.
机译:在本文中,我们寻找了最合适的西北亚得里亚海底栖生态质量状态(EcoQS)评估方法。考虑到历史和当前信息,我们将我们对EcoQS的期望与Bentix,AMBI和M-AMBI分类指标结果进行了相互比较,并研究了这些指数对空间,季节和年际变化的敏感性底栖社区。沿富营养化的(反向)梯度,采样点相对于Po河口的距离增加。此外,CEBEB站点还执行了为期两年的每月监测计划(2004年10月至2006年9月),该站点位于被调查区域的中央位置。结果突出表明,这三个指数对底栖群落的时空变异敏感性不同。底栖动物群落的强烈季节性和年度间变化对Bentix有显着影响,而对使用M-AMBI和AMBI方法获得的EcoQS分配没有观察到相关变化。 Bentix和AMBI获得的环境质量比(EQR)值和EcoQS分类与预期不符,因为它们与相对于Po口的站点距离没有负相关,而M-AMBI则最能区分和最少富营养化的地点。因此,看来M-AMBI被认为是西北亚得里亚海底栖生态系统生态状况评估的最有价值的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号