...
首页> 外文期刊>The Manchester school >Fixed-fee vs. royalty licensing under asymmetric demand information
【24h】

Fixed-fee vs. royalty licensing under asymmetric demand information

机译:不对称需求信息下的固定费用与皇室许可证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When there is asymmetry in the market size information held by an R&D firm outside a market that possesses new technology for lowering production costs, along with a monopoly firm that engages in production activities inside the market, the producing firm has an incentive to make its market size look smaller to reduce licensing fees. Fixed-fee licensing is desirable for R&D firms in the absence of information asymmetry, but royalty licensing and a mixture of fees and royalties can work as a means to resolve information asymmetry. Using a dynamic model of signaling, this study shows that fixed-fee licensing is adopted when the level of a new technology is large or small, while royalty licensing is adopted when the level is moderate.
机译:当市场规模的市场规模信息中有不对称的市场,该市场以外拥有新技术的新技术,以及从市场内部开展生产活动的垄断公司,生产公司具有促进其市场的动力 尺寸看起来很小,以减少许可费。 在没有信息不对称的情况下,R&D公司可取的固定费用许可,但费用和费用和特许权使用费的混合可以作为解决信息不对称的手段。 使用动态信令模型,本研究显示,当新技术的水平大或小时,采用固定费用许可,而当水平适度时采用版税许多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号