...
首页> 外文期刊>Magazine of Concrete Research >Biaxial f lexural strength of concrete by two different methods
【24h】

Biaxial f lexural strength of concrete by two different methods

机译:两种不同方法对混凝土的双轴抗弯强度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The biaxial flexural strength of a concrete panel can be evaluated by two different methods: the centrally loaded round panel test (ASTM C 1150) and the recently proposed biaxial flexure test (BFT). Twenty-six tests, with 13 specimens for each test method, were performed to verify the effect of the different test methods on the biaxial flexural strength of concrete. A finite-element analysis of the specimens of two test methods showed that the biaxial flexure test set-up allows a larger area with a uniform biaxial stress on the bottom surface around the centre of the specimen than the ASTM C 1550 set-up, indicating that the difference in the test results is attributable to the volume effects. The test results showed that the biaxial flexure test method gives a more reliable biaxial flexural strength with a 25% lower coefficient of variation than that from the ASTM C 1550.
机译:可以通过两种不同的方法来评估混凝土面板的双轴弯曲强度:中心加载的圆形面板测试(ASTM C 1150)和最近提出的双轴弯曲测试(BFT)。进行了26项测试,每种测试方法有13个样品,以验证不同测试方法对混凝土双轴弯曲强度的影响。对两种测试方法的样品进行的有限元分析表明,与ASTM C 1550设置相比,双轴弯曲测试装置允许在样品中心附近的底部表面上具有更大的面积,且在均匀的双轴应力下,表明测试结果的差异归因于体积效应。测试结果表明,与ASTM C 1550相比,双轴挠曲测试方法可提供更可靠的双轴挠曲强度,且变异系数低25%。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Magazine of Concrete Research》 |2012年第12期|1057-1065|共9页
  • 作者单位

    School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, South Korea;

    School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, South Korea;

    School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, South Korea;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号