...
首页> 外文期刊>Magazine of Concrete Research >Hollowcore slab with alternative cementitious materials for winter conditions
【24h】

Hollowcore slab with alternative cementitious materials for winter conditions

机译:HollowCore平板与替代水泥材料,用于冬季条件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The precast industry, due to its specific early-age strength requirements for hollowcore (HC) slab products, has been reluctant to introduce alternative cementitious materials such as ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) due to the slower strength development of such materials. This paper reports on a study undertaken at a precast production facility to examine how to overcome the consequences of strength loss due to the replacement of up to 50% of CEM I (42.5R), as usually used in cold weather conditions, with GGBS, for environmental or durability reasons. The GGBS concrete slabs were activated using thermal, chemical and mechanical means to enhance their early-age strength gain. The results were compared at early ages in terms of the temperature profile during curing, cube compressive strengths, load-carrying capacities for transportability requirements, ultimate load and short-term creep. In addition, 28 d densities and strengths were compared for in situ cubes and cores extracted from HC slab samples. The experimental results showed a favourable potential for replacing CEM I (42.5R) cement with up to 50% GGBS in winter without compromising on factory productivity.
机译:预制产业源于其特定的高度早期强度要求,由于这种材料的强度较慢的强度发展,这一直不愿地引入替代水泥材料,如地面粒状高炉炉渣(GGB)。本文报告了一个在预制生产设施中进行的研究,以检查如何克服强度损失的后果,因为在寒冷的天气条件下使用高达50%的CEM I(42.5R),通常用于GGB,有关环境或耐用性的原因。使用热,化学和机械手段激活GGBS混凝土板,以增强其早期强度增益。在固化过程中,在温度曲线,立方体抗压强度,承载能力,用于可运输性要求,终极载荷和短期蠕变的载荷能力,结果是在早期的时代进行比较。此外,比较了28天的密度和强度,以便从HC板样品中提取的原位立方体和核心。实验结果表明,在冬季替代CEM I(42.5R)水泥的良好潜力,在冬季冬季最多50%的GGB,而不会损害工厂生产率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号