...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology >Towards an Understanding of the Relationship Between Disciplinary Research Cultures and Open Access Repository Behaviors
【24h】

Towards an Understanding of the Relationship Between Disciplinary Research Cultures and Open Access Repository Behaviors

机译:理解学科研究文化与开放存取存储库行为之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article explores the cultural characteristics of three open access (OA)-friendly disciplines (physics, economics, and clinical medicine) and the ways in which those characteristics influence perceptions, motivations, and behaviors toward green OA. The empirical data are taken from two online surveys of European authors. Taking a domain analytic approach, the analysis draws on Becher and Trawler's (2001) and Whitley's (2000) theories to gain a deeper understanding of why OA repositories (OAR) play a particularly important role in the chosen disciplines. The surveys provided a unique opportunity to compare perceptions, motivations, and behaviors of researchers at the discipline level with the parent metadiscipline. It should be noted that participants were not drawn from a stratified sample of all the different subdisciplines that constitute each discipline, and therefore the generalizability of the findings to the discipline may be limited. The differential role of informal and formal communication in each of the three disciplines has shaped green OA practices. For physicists and economists, preprints are an essential feature of their respective OAR landscapes, whereas for clinical medics final published articles have a central role. In comparing the disciplines with their parent metadisci-plines there were some notable similarities/differences, which have methodological implications for studying research cultures.
机译:本文探讨了三个开放获取(OA)友好学科(物理,经济学和临床医学)的文化特征,以及这些特征如何影响对绿色OA的看法,动机和行为。经验数据来自对欧洲作家的两次在线调查。采用领域分析方法,该分析借鉴了Becher和Trawler(2001)和Whitley(2000)的理论,以更深入地了解OA知识库(OAR)为什么在所选学科中发挥特别重要的作用。这些调查提供了一个独特的机会,可以将研究人员在学科水平上的看法,动机和行为与父母的元学科进行比较。应该注意的是,参与者并非来自构成每个学科的所有不同子学科的分层样本,因此研究结果对该学科的普遍性可能受到限制。在这三个学科中,非正式和正式沟通的不同作用塑造了绿色OA的实践。对于物理学家和经济学家来说,预印本是他们各自OAR格局的基本特征,而对于临床医生而言,最终发表的文章则起着核心作用。在将这些学科与其父元学科进行比较时,存在一些显着的相似/不同之处,这对研究研究文化具有方法学上的意义。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    School of the Arts, English and Drama, Loughborough University, Epinal Way, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK;

    Centre for Information Management, School of Business and Economics, Loughborough University, Epinal Way, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK;

    Department of Computer Science, Loughborough University, Epinal Way, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK;

    Centre for Information Management, School of Business and Economics, Loughborough University, Epinal Way, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号