首页> 外文期刊>Journal of surveying engineering >Dedication of Highways in Texas
【24h】

Dedication of Highways in Texas

机译:德克萨斯州的公路奉献

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This note discusses the methods for establishing highways in the State of Texas with the focus being on common-law dedication. In general, dedication is the intentional appropriation or donation of land or of an easement or interest therein by its owner for some proper public use. The elements essential to the creation of a valid dedication include a person competent to dedicate, a public purpose that will be served by the dedication, an offer of dedication, and an acceptance of the offer. Though there are, and have been, many uses for dedications, the most common use of dedication is as a highway. The existence of a valid dedication must first be based on an intention of the landowner to devote his land to public use. Whether the grantor had intent to dedicate is a question of fact. An intention to dedicate land to a public use may be evidenced by oral declarations, which may be sufficient without more to constitute an offer of dedication. A dedication is not a conveyance; therefore a writing is not necessary and the statute of frauds is regarded as inapplicable to this kind of transfer. As in the case of the intention to dedicate, the intention to accept may be presumed as a matter of law when there is no evidence sufficient to characterize the public's use of the land in controversy. Finally, the public use need not be for any particular length of time as it need not correspond with any of the periods of time mentioned in the statute of limitations. All that is requisite is that the use should be for such a period that it may fairly be inferred that the public desire to accept exists.
机译:本说明讨论了在德克萨斯州建立高速公路的方法,重点是普通法奉献。一般而言,奉献精神是指所有者为某种适当的公共用途而故意占用或捐赠土地或其中的地役权或权益。建立有效奉献的基本要素包括:有奉献精神的人,奉献将为之服务的公共宗旨,奉献要约和接受要约。尽管有并且已经有很多专用的用途,但专用的最常见用途是用作高速公路。有效奉献的存在必须首先基于土地所有者将其土地专用于公共用途的意图。设保人是否有意奉献是事实。专用于公共用途的土地的意图可以通过口头声明来证明,这可能就足够了,而又没有更多的内容可以构成对土地的奉献。奉献不是交通工具。因此,没有必要写信,并且欺诈法规被认为不适用于这种转移。与专门用途的情况一样,当没有足够的证据证明公众对土地的使用存在争议时,可以认为接受的意愿是一个法律问题。最后,公共用途不必有任何特定的时间长度,因为它不必与时效法规中提到的任何时间段相对应。所有必要的条件是,使用时间应合理地推断出存在公众接受的愿望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号