首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the royal Asiatic society >The Arabian Frontier Of The British Raj: Merchants, Rulers And The British In The Nineteenth-century Gulp
【24h】

The Arabian Frontier Of The British Raj: Merchants, Rulers And The British In The Nineteenth-century Gulp

机译:英属拉吉人的阿拉伯边境:19世纪的吞没中的商人,统治者和英国人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Shortly after stepping down as Viceroy of India, Lord Curzon remarked that "It has been the policy of Protectorates that the Indian Empire has for more than a century pursued, and is still pursuing, its as yet unexhausted advance" (p. vii). Taking Curzon's words as his starting point, James Onley focuses on the Arabian frontier of the British raj. Indeed, one of Onley's most penetrating conclusions is that "the Indian Empire was much larger than current Indian historiography says it was, and that the informal part of this empire included Arabia" (p. 216). Taking his analysis still further, Onley remarks that "it becomes apparent that British India itself had an informal sub-empire in South Asia, Arabia, and East Africa comprised of semi-independent states under the suzerainty of the British Crown' (pp. 216-217). It is the semi-independent states of the Gulf on which Onley's book concentrates. One of the most significant aspects of his excellent book is British reliance on 'native agents' for the maintenance of imperial interests and influence in the region throughout the nineteenth century.
机译:在辞去印度总督职务后不久,库尔松勋爵说:“印度帝国在过去的一个多世纪中一直奉行并仍在追赶它,这是保护国的政策,而且它仍在不断地追求它的不竭进步”(第vii页)。詹姆斯·昂利(James Onley)以寇松(Curzon)的话为出发点,着眼于英国王朝的阿拉伯边境。的确,Onley最有说服力的结论之一是,“印度帝国比现在的印度史学所描述的要大得多,而且这个帝国的非正式部分包括阿拉伯”(第216页)。 Onley进一步分析了这一观点,他说:“很明显,英属印度本身在南亚,阿拉伯和东非有一个非正式的子帝国,由英国直属的主权下的半独立国家组成”(第216页)。 -217)。Onley的书集中在海湾的半独立国家,他的出色著作最重要的方面之一是英国在整个地区维护帝国利益和影响力时依赖“本土特工”十九世纪。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号