【24h】

The Malabar Rebellion

机译:马拉巴尔叛乱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There are echoes here of all the rebellions that took place during British rule; that of 1857 and the question ot whether this was a planned rebellion, the events of Amritsar in 1919 and the terrible over-reaction of British authority to protest, the eventual widespread attack on property and open warfare which characterised the Quit India satyagraha of 1942.rnHistorians have always seen the importance of gauging whether the Malabar Rebellion was class conflict between peasant and landlord or a communal divide between Hindu and Muslim. If class conflict underlay communalism - the argument being that, if the landlord class could exploit communalism to divert social violence away from themselves onto a larger community, then ameliorative measures such as tenancy reform would pre-empt a religious divide that would prove disastrous for Indian nationalism. K N Pannikar in Against Lord and State; Religion and Peasant Uprisings in Malabar 1836-1921 (Oxford, 1989) argued along these lines.
机译:这里回荡着英国统治期间发生的所有叛乱。这是1857年的叛乱以及是否有计划的叛乱,1919年阿姆利则(Amritsar)发生的事件以及英国当局抗议的可怕过度反应,最终对财产的广泛攻击和公开战争等问题,这是1942年退出印度的行列。历史学家一直认为,衡量马拉巴尔叛乱是农民与地主之间的阶级冲突,还是印度教与穆斯林之间的社会鸿沟,都很重要。如果阶级冲突成为共产主义的基础-论点是,如果地主阶级可以利用共产主义将社会暴力从自己转移到更大的社区,那么诸如租赁改革之类的宽松措施将避免宗教分歧,这将给印度人带来灾难性的后果民族主义。 K N Pannikar在《反对君主与国家》中;马拉巴尔1836-1921年的宗教与农民起义(牛津,1989年)遵循了这些观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号