...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of intelligent material systems and structures >Comparison of Control Laws for Vibration Suppression Based on Energy Consumption
【24h】

Comparison of Control Laws for Vibration Suppression Based on Energy Consumption

机译:基于能耗的减振控制规律比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The research study presented here examines four conventional vibration suppression control laws and four hybrid modifications of these laws using a switching method. The motivation is to determine which of these eight controllers results in the least amount of power flow to the actuator to have the same settling time under free vibrations. The reason to look at reduced energy controllers is the idea that in some applications, very little energy is available for control, yet passive and semi-active methods cannot meet performance demands. In particular, the eventual goal is to reduce transient vibrations of smart structures using energy obtained from harvesting and/or low-power storage devices (batteries or super capacitors), as often desirable in aerospace systems. The four conventional active control systems compared in this study are Positive Position Feedback (PPF) control, Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) control, non-linear control, and Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) controls. A hybrid version of each controller is obtained by implementing a bang-bang control law (on-off control). The bang-bang control algorithm switches the control voltage between an external voltage supply and the feedback signal provided by the PPF, PID, non-linear, or LQR controllers. The purpose of combining the bang-bang control law with the aforementioned controllers is to reduce the power requirement for vibration suppression by providing an active controller with limited voltage input. Free vibrations of a thin cantilevered beam with a piezoceramic transducer are controlled by these eight controllers with a focus on the fundamental transverse vibration mode. Experimental results exhibit that the system with hybrid bang-bang-non-linear controller requires 67.3% less power than its conventional version. The hybrid versions require significantly less power flow compared to their conventional counterparts for the PPF, PID, and LQR controllers as well. Experiments also reveal the presence of substantial piezoelectric non-linearities in the transducer. The voltage-dependent behavior of the electromechanical coupling coefficient is identified empirically and represented by a curve-fit expression. A real-time adaptive control algorithm is developed to account for the voltage-dependent behavior of the coupling coefficient, enabling good agreement between the simulation and experimental results.
机译:这里提出的研究研究使用切换方法检查了四个常规的振动抑制控制定律以及这些定律的四个混合修改。动机是要确定这八个控制器中的哪一个导致在自由振动下流向执行器的功率最少,从而具有相同的建立时间。之所以选择节能的控制器,是因为在某些应用中,几乎没有能量可用于控制,而被动和半主动方法却不能满足性能要求。特别地,最终目标是使用从采集和/或低功率存储设备(电池或超级电容器)获得的能量来减少智能结构的瞬态振动,这在航空航天系统中通常是希望的。在本研究中比较的四个常规主动控制系统是正位置反馈(PPF)控制,比例积分微分(PID)控制,非线性控制和线性二次调节器(LQR)控制。每个控制器的混合版本可通过实施爆炸控制规则(开-关控制)来获得。 bang-bang控制算法在外部电压源和PPF,PID,非线性或LQR控制器提供的反馈信号之间切换控制电压。组合爆炸控制定律和上述控制器的目的是通过为有源控制器提供有限的电压输入来降低振动抑制的功率要求。这八个控制器着重于基本横向振动模式,控制着带有压电陶瓷换能器的悬臂梁的自由振动。实验结果表明,带有混合爆炸-非线性控制器的系统比常规系统需要的功率少67.3%。与传统的PPF,PID和LQR控制器相比,混合动力版本所需的功率流要少得多。实验还揭示了换能器中存在大量的压电非线性。机电耦合系数的电压相关行为通过经验确定,并由曲线拟合表达式表示。开发了一种实时自适应控制算法来考虑耦合系数的电压相关行为,从而使仿真结果与实验结果保持良好的一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号