...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Information Technology Cases and Applications >Defining CSFs for Information Systems Strategic Planning in Holding Companies: A Case Study of an Iranian Managerial Holding Company (System Group)
【24h】

Defining CSFs for Information Systems Strategic Planning in Holding Companies: A Case Study of an Iranian Managerial Holding Company (System Group)

机译:为控股公司的信息系统战略规划定义CSF:以伊朗管理控股公司(系统集团)为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Holding companies (HCs) differ in their nature and behavior from other types of companies. Their role is to support, control and budget their subsidiaries. In general, HCs do not compete directly with one another, as it is difficult to find two HCs with the same product and service portfolios. Competition occurs instead at the subsidiary level against companies, which may or may not be part of other HCs, in overlapping markets with similar products and services. This concept of competition, which differs from that of typical commercial companies, is central to the development of HC strategies for supporting and controlling their subsidiaries. Information Systems Strategic Planning (ISSP) attempts to align information systems strategy with business strategy by directing the investment in information systems so as to satisfy strategic goals. Traditionally, ISSP methodologies have addressed the definition of information systems for Strategic Business Units (SBU). This research demonstrates, using a case study of an Iranian Managerial Holding Company, how ISSP can be applied instead to Strategic Business Processes (SBP). It illustrates how to define Critical Success Factors (CSFs) and Information System Needs (ISN) on Strategic Processes instead of Strategic Units. Moreover, this study combines the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) with a statistical questionnaire survey to define strategic processes.
机译:控股公司(HC)的性质和行为与其他类型的公司不同。他们的职责是支持,控制和预算子公司。通常,HC不会彼此直接竞争,因为很难找到两个具有相同产品和服务组合的HC。在具有类似产品和服务的重叠市场中,与子公司(可能是也可能不是其他HC的一部分)的竞争发生在子公司一级。与典型的商业公司不同,这种竞争概念对于制定支持和控制其子公司的HC战略至关重要。信息系统战略规划(ISSP)试图通过指导对信息系统的投资来使信息系统战略与业务战略保持一致,以满足战略目标。传统上,ISSP方法论解决了战略业务部门(SBU)信息系统的定义。这项研究使用伊朗管理控股公司的案例演示了如何将ISSP替代地应用于战略业务流程(SBP)。它说明了如何在战略流程而不是战略单位上定义关键成功因素(CSF)和信息系统需求(ISN)。此外,本研究将平衡计分卡(BSC)与统计问卷调查相结合以定义战略流程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号