...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydraulic Engineering >Free-Surface versus Rigid-Lid LES Computations for Bridge-Abutment Flow
【24h】

Free-Surface versus Rigid-Lid LES Computations for Bridge-Abutment Flow

机译:桥台流动的自由面与刚性LES计算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Two separate large eddy simulations (LES) are carried out to investigate the effects of accurate computation of the curvilinear water-surface deformation of the flow through a bridge contraction. One LES employs the rigid-lid boundary condition at the water surface, while the other uses a highly accurate level-set method (LSM), which allows the water surface to adjust itself freely in response to the flow. The simulation with the LSM is validated with data from complementary physical model tests under analogous geometrical and flow conditions. Streamwise velocity, bed-shear stress and second-order turbulence statistics obtained from both simulations are compared, and it is shown that the turbulence structure of this flow is influenced strongly by the water-surface deformation. While bed-shear stresses and first-order statistics are very similar for both cases, the instantaneous turbulence structure and consequently, the second-order statistics, are distinctly different. The correct prediction of the water-surface deformation of such flows is deemed important for the accuracy of their simulation. (C) 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
机译:进行了两个单独的大涡模拟(LES),以研究精确计算通过桥梁收缩的水流的曲线水面变形的影响。一个LES在水表面采用了刚性-盖边界条件,而另一个LES使用了一种高度精确的水平设定方法(LSM),该方法可以使水表面根据流量自由地进行调整。在相似的几何和流动条件下,通过补充物理模型测试的数据验证了LSM的仿真。比较了两种模拟获得的水流速度,床剪应力和二阶湍流统计量,结果表明,该水流的湍流结构受水面变形的强烈影响。虽然两种情况下的床剪应力和一阶统计量非常相似,但瞬时湍流结构以及因此的二阶统计量却截然不同。这种流动的水面变形的正确预测被认为对于其模拟的准确性很重要。 (C)2015年美国土木工程师学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号