...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of geodynamics >Accuracy assessment of ocean tide loading computations for precise geodetic observations
【24h】

Accuracy assessment of ocean tide loading computations for precise geodetic observations

机译:精确评估大洋潮汐潮汐载荷计算的准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The increasing resolution of ground based gravity measurements (e.g. by superconducting gravimeters) as well as satellite based gravity field studies allows to study very small signals, globally as well as local. On the other hand, this requires the correction of such signals to uncover others. To study the Earth's deep interior and the on-going dynamic processes requires the correction of disturbing signals, and one of these signals is related to ocean tidal loading. Although new ocean tide models are being derived from current satellite missions, there are still uncertainties. In this paper we present an intercomparison ocean tide models to test their fit to world-wide observations. Therefore, three TOPEX/POSEIDON (T/P) satellite derived models (CSR3.0, FES95.2 and TPXO.2) beside the classical SCHW80 model were selected for an accuracy assessment study. The selected models have been subjected to an intercomparison test, tide gauge validation test and comparison to 59 tidal gravity stations. The intercomparison test shows a good agreement between the T/P-based models for the open ocean and remarkable disagreement between the selected models in the coastal regions indicating that such models are still problematic in these regions. The tide gauge validation shows that the T/P derived models fit tide gauges better than SCHW80, with a better fit for the semidiurnal constituents than for the diurnal constituents. Comparing the gravimetric ocean-tide loading computed from the selected models with the residuals from a set of 59 tidal gravity stations shows that there is an improvement of the T/P derived models with respect to the Schwiderski model, especially in M2. However, this improvement is not as significant as the result of the comparison with the pelagic data. The procedure developed for the comparison of T/P derived models with SCHW80 is presented. The results provide not only information and improvement with regard to SCHW80, but also information about the properties of the new models. It is intended to continue this work applying the very recent models to see how they perform compared to this study. With this study we provide boundary conditions for the improvement of new ocean-tide models in order to benefit from the gravity measurements now possible regarding the evaluation of Earth structures and dynamic processes.
机译:基于地面的重力测量(例如通过超导重力仪)以及基于卫星的重力场研究的分辨率不断提高,可以研究全球乃至本地的非常小的信号。另一方面,这需要对这种信号进行校正以发现其他信号。要研究地球的深层内部和持续的动态过程,需要校正干扰信号,这些信号之一与海洋潮汐负荷有关。尽管新的海洋潮汐模型是从当前的卫星任务中得出的,但仍然存在不确定性。在本文中,我们提出了一种比较海洋潮汐模型,以检验其与世界范围观测值的拟合度。因此,除了经典SCHW80模型外,还选择了三个TOPEX / POSEIDON(T / P)卫星衍生模型(CSR3.0,FES95.2和TPXO.2)进行准确性评估研究。选定的型号经过了比对测试,潮汐仪验证测试以及与59个潮汐重力站的比较。相互比较测试表明,在基于T / P的远洋模型与沿海地区所选模型之间存在显着分歧时,表明这些模型在这些地区仍然存在问题。潮汐计验证表明,T / P推导模型比SCHW80更适合潮汐计,并且与日昼相比,半日要素的拟合更好。将根据所选模型计算出的重力海潮载荷与来自59个潮汐重力站的残差进行比较,可以看出,相对于Schwiderski模型,T / P推导模型有改进,特别是在M2中。但是,这种改善并不像与远洋数据进行比较的结果那么显着。介绍了为比较T / P衍生模型与SCHW80而开发的过程。结果不仅提供了有关SCHW80的信息和改进,还提供了有关新模型特性的信息。打算继续使用最新模型来进行这项工作,以查看与本研究相比它们的性能如何。通过这项研究,我们为改进新的海洋潮汐模型提供了边界条件,以便受益于目前在评估地球结构和动力过程方面可能进行的重力测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号