...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Gender Studies >Gender monoglossia, gender heteroglossia: the potential of Bakhtin's work for re-conceptualising gender
【24h】

Gender monoglossia, gender heteroglossia: the potential of Bakhtin's work for re-conceptualising gender

机译:性别垄断,性别异质性:巴赫金工作在重新概念化性别方面的潜力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The development of an analysis of gender which avoids conflations with sex, but which also acknowledges the powerful role of embodiment in gender production, has tantalised gender theorists for some time. Many writers have critiqued the slippage back to sexed bodies underlying various apparently social constructionist analyses of gendered behaviour. Conversely, some poststructuralist and ‘Third Wave’ accounts of gender have been accused of paying insufficient attention to the role of the material in productions of gender. This article draws on Mikhail Bakhtin's work, particularly his concepts of monoglossia and heteroglossia, as offering an application to gender which addresses such tensions and binaries, recognising both the power and effects of (‘monoglossic’) binarised accounts of gender, but also the diverse heteroglossia at play in all such productions. It is argued that analysis of monoglossia and heteroglossia in gender performance facilitates the simultaneous ‘holding’ of recognition of (a) the impact of the material and the discursive in gender construction; and (b) the active work undertaken by dominant, traditional accounts of gender to author themselves as ‘real’ and total, while also identifying the contradictions and diversity within these productions. The article begins by outlining dilemmas facing contemporary gender theory, and then explaining Bakhtin's work on monoglossia and heteroglossia in language. These concepts are then applied to gender, elaborating how the monoglossic, binary account of gender operates to mask and pathologise heteroglossia; yet how heteroglossia nevertheless exists in all productions of gender. It is argued that Bakhtin's work, in application to gender, offers a sophisticated account that can address existing theoretical binaries, acknowledging the role of the material, and of social structures, while simultaneously identifying and celebrating heteroglossic disturbances integral to gender production.View full textDownload full textKeywordsgender, feminist theory, Bakhtin, poststructuralism, embodiment, heteroglossia, monoglossiaRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2012.639174
机译:性别分析的发展既避免了与性别的混淆,又承认了体现在性别生产中的强大作用,这在一定程度上一直诱使性别理论家。许多作家批评这种滑倒回到有性的身体,而这些身体是各种对性别行为的明显的社会建构主义分析的基础。相反,一些后结构主义者和“第三波”关于性别的论述被指控没有充分注意材料在性别生产中的作用。本文借鉴了米哈伊尔·巴赫金(Mikhail Bakhtin)的工作,尤其是他对垄断和异性的概念,为性别问题提供了一种应用,解决了这种紧张关系和二元问题,同时认识到(“ monoglossic”)二元化性别观点的力量和影响,但是在所有这些作品中,多样化的异质性也在发挥作用。有人认为,对性别表现中的大语和异语的分析有助于同时“把握”(a)物质的影响和话语对性别建构的影响; (b)占主导地位的传统性别观点所做的积极工作,将自己写成“真实”和总体,同时也确定了这些作品之间的矛盾和多样性。文章首先概述了当代性别理论面临的困境,然后解释了巴赫金在语言上的垄断和异性恋方面的工作。然后将这些概念应用于性别,阐述性别的单语二元账户如何掩盖和病理化异质性。然而,在所有性别的生产中仍然存在异质症。有人认为,巴赫金(Bakhtin)的工作适用于性别,提供了一个复杂的账户,可以处理现有的理论二进制文件,承认材料和社会结构的作用,同时识别和庆祝性别生产必不可少的杂种干扰。查看全文下载关键字性别,女权主义理论,巴赫金语,后结构主义,具体化,异质性,垄断等。 ,more“,pubid:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2012.639174

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号