...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Forestry >The Effects of Forest Regeneration on Preferences for Forest Treatments among Foresters, Environmentalists, and the General Public
【24h】

The Effects of Forest Regeneration on Preferences for Forest Treatments among Foresters, Environmentalists, and the General Public

机译:森林更新对森林人,环保主义者和公众的森林待遇偏好的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study explored changes in forest preferences among three different groups-foresters, environmentalists, and the general public (n = 410)-over a 7-year period for five different forest treatment types. Preferences were assessed for near views of clearcut, two-age cut, patch cut, group selection, and commercial thin. Results show that time since harvest significantly affected preference, with preferences generally increasing over time, but that the rate and pattern of preference change varied considerably according to the forest treatment type and the population group. The pattern of the initial harvest-specifically, the size of the openings and the uniformity of the harvest pattern across the landscape-appeared particularly important in influencing preference change. In addition, results show that although preferences among the groups tended to converge over time for less-intensive treatments, foresters' preferences remained higher than those of the other groups for more-intensive treatments (i.e., patch cut, two age, and clearcut). These results caution against overreliance on static preference studies when incorporating aesthetic considerations into forest planning decisions. Results also caution the forestry community against overestimating the positive effects of green-up on nonforester preferences, particularly for areas of intensive harvesting. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:这项研究探讨了三种不同类型的森林处理方法在7年的时间里,三个不同的群体-林业者,环保主义者和公众(n = 410)对森林偏好的变化。对偏好进行了评估,以了解清晰,两年龄,补丁,组选择和商业瘦身的近景。结果表明,自采伐以来的时间显着影响偏好,偏好通常随时间而增加,但是偏好的变化率和模式因森林处理类型和种群而异。最初的收获方式-特别是开口的大小和整个景观中收获方式的均匀性-在影响偏好变化方面显得尤为重要。此外,结果表明,尽管对于强度较低的处理,各组之间的偏好趋向于趋于一致,但对于强度较高的处理(例如,斑块切割,两岁和整割),林务员的偏好仍然高于其他组。 。这些结果警告在将美学考虑因素纳入森林规划决策时,不要过分依赖静态偏好研究。结果还警告林业界,不要过分高估绿化对非林业者的偏爱的积极影响,特别是在集约采伐地区。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Forestry》 |2010年第5期|p.215-229|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Received January 8, 2008, accepted August 11, 2009.Anne Kearney (anne@alexanne.net) is affiliate assistant professor. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington and principal, Kearney Environmental LLC, Jenna R. Tilt (jennat@u. washington.edu) is courtesy assistant professor. Department of Geosciences, Oregon State University, and Gordon R. Bradley (gbradley@ u. washington.edu) is professor, School of Forest Resources, University of Washington, 1 135 20th Avenue E" Seattle, WA 981 12. This research was funded by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources and the US Forest Service Pacific Northwest (PNW) Research Station. The authors thank the following US Forest Service personnel: Stephen Reutebuch, David Marshall, Robert Curtis, and Dean DeBeIl at the Olympia Lab, Roger Clark at the Seattle Lab, and Charlie Peterson, Bob Deal, and Jamie Barbour at the PNW Portbnd Lab.Copyright © 2010 by the Society of American Foresters.,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号