...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of European Competition Law & Practice >Attaching Criminal Liability to Organizations for Anti-Competitive Offences: What Can Be Learnt From the Canadian Experience
【24h】

Attaching Criminal Liability to Organizations for Anti-Competitive Offences: What Can Be Learnt From the Canadian Experience

机译:对反竞争犯罪的组织追究刑事责任:可以从加拿大的经验中学到什么

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Canada has adopted an interesting approach to applying corporate criminal liability to anti-competitive offences, which is similar in some aspects to certain systems existing in Europe, yet also very distinct from other European models. The Canadian corporate criminal liability regime in respect of anti-competitive offences may be summarized as follows: The criminal liability of organizations may be triggered by the perpetration of any criminal offence, including anti-competitive and economic offences such as bid-rigging, price-fixing cartels, corruption of foreign public officials, or fraud. Organizations subject to criminal liability include more than just corporations: certain persons, groups, and associations without a separate legal entity can also be found criminally liable and sentenced to a fine. A court may not criminally convict an organization without evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that one of its identifiable members committed an anti-competitive offence.
机译:加拿大采用了一种有趣的方法将公司刑事责任应用于反竞争犯罪,在某些方面与欧洲现有的某些系统相似,但也与其他欧洲模式截然不同。关于反竞争犯罪的加拿大公司刑事责任制度可以概括如下:组织的刑事责任可能因犯下任何刑事犯罪而触发,包括反竞争和经济犯罪,例如操纵投标,修理卡特尔,外国公职人员的腐败或欺诈。承担刑事责任的组织不仅包括公司,还包括没有单独法人的某些个人,团体和协会,也应被追究刑事责任并处以罚款。没有合理证据不能证明其可识别的成员之一犯有反竞争罪行的罪行,法院不得对组织定罪。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号