...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic issues >Frank W. Taussig's Institutionalism
【24h】

Frank W. Taussig's Institutionalism

机译:弗兰克·陶西格的制度主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In his magisterial treatise, The Economic Mind in American Civilization, Joseph Dorfman argued that despite Frank W. Taussig's liberal editorship of the Quarterly Journal of Economics (QJE henceforth) and his tolerance of heterodox ideas in general, Taussig was actually quite conservative (1949, 267). He also noted elsewhere that Taussig had a "cautious bent towards social change," particularly regarding collective bargaining, compulsory social insurance, and unemployment insurance because unlike her British and German counterparts, the USA lacked the relevant socio-political or institutional framework to adequately handle these practices (1959, 240-243). These characterizations, along with Joseph Schumpeter's description of Taussig as "the American Marshall," have seemingly embedded in the minds of historians of economic thought an image of Taussig as a conservative, neoclassical economist. But just as scholars of an institutionalist persuasion—particularly in the area of contemporary evolutionary economics—have "discovered" Alfred Marshall's heterodox leanings, Taussig may deserve a similar reconsideration. This paper seeks to take up the earlier leads provided by Schumpeter (1966) and Warren Samuels (1988, 1989) and draw attention to the fact Taussig had much more in common with American institutionalism, and in particular with elements of Thorstein Veblen's work, than historians of economic thought have hitherto considered. In fact, Taussig shared many of the traits widely cited by historians of economic thought to characterize those working in the institutionalist tradition and pursued a research agenda that had much in common with the pivotal institutionalists of his time.
机译:约瑟夫·多夫曼(Joseph Dorfman)在他的权威论文《美国文明的经济思想》中指出,尽管弗兰克·W·陶西格(Frank W. Taussig)担任《经济学季刊》(QJE)的自由编辑,并且他宽容异质主义思想,但陶西格实际上还是很保守的(1949 267)。他还在其他地方指出,陶西格对社会变革持谨慎态度,尤其是在集体谈判,强制性社会保险和失业保险方面,因为与英国和德国同行不同,美国缺乏相关的社会政治或制度框架来适当应对这些做法(1959,240-243)。这些特征以及约瑟夫·熊彼特(Joseph Schumpeter)将Taussig描述为“美国马歇尔”的观点,似乎已嵌入经济学思想史家的脑海,这是Taussig作为保守的新古典经济学家的形象。但是,正如制度主义说服力的学者(尤其是在当代进化经济学领域)已经“发现”阿尔弗雷德·马歇尔的异端倾向一样,陶西格也应该得到类似的反思。本文力求采用熊彼特(1966)和沃伦·塞缪尔斯(1988,1989)提出的较早的观点,并提请人们注意陶西格与美国制度主义,特别是与托尔斯泰因·维勃伦的工作要素相比,具有更多共通之处。迄今为止,经济思想史学家已经考虑过。实际上,陶西格拥有许多经济思想史学家广泛引用的特征,这些特征表征了那些在制度主义传统中工作的人,并推行了与他那个时代的关键制度主义者有很多共同点的研究议程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号